Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowJuly 7 - July 17 | Round 2 of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships. Don't miss your chance! Learn more
I have this table:
For each one of these categories, they have their own formulas that all look like this:
Which all are displayed on 2 separate graphs like this:
Now, what I'm trying to figure out how to do is to simplify this process. It currently works as intended, but I'm sure there's a way to gather these counts and percentages without having to give each category 2 of it's own formulas?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Very likely as you can display an aggregation as "Percent of Grand Total". If you have your groups, why do you need an individual calculation for each category count versus a measure that is simply "Measure = COUNT('Case'[CaseNumber])" The context of the measure in the visualization should relegate this to the correct "Origin" if you have Origin as the Legend for example.
Very likely as you can display an aggregation as "Percent of Grand Total". If you have your groups, why do you need an individual calculation for each category count versus a measure that is simply "Measure = COUNT('Case'[CaseNumber])" The context of the measure in the visualization should relegate this to the correct "Origin" if you have Origin as the Legend for example.
@Greg_Deckler You're right! I always realize the answer to my question right after asking. Thanks Greg!
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Join Fabric Data Days 2026: 60 days of free live/on-demand sessions, challenges, study groups, and certification opportunities.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 22 | |
| 18 | |
| 17 | |
| 13 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 61 | |
| 52 | |
| 47 | |
| 41 | |
| 38 |