Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
I'm unable to figure out how to setup row-level security on multiple dimensions for a model as described/shown below.
I've tried to provide as much detail as possible with sample data that pretty closely represents the actual model. I know how to setup dynamic security for just the Org piece but both the Org and Project is where I'm struggling.
Would appreciate any guidance on how I could make it happen.
Here's a link to a sample model I created in Power BI -> https://file.io/Ty9Nem
Solved! Go to Solution.
No, it's not possible to achieve this kind of RLS. We can only apply dynamic row level filter to limit access based on "1 to 1" mapping which can be achieved with LOOKUPVALUE(). However, we can't have this dynamic security across more than two tables.
For example, you can get the Org ID based on accessing user. Then you can still get another column value with LOOKUPVALUE() based on these "filtered" Org ID. But you can't go any further to map next column.
Regards,
No, it's not possible to achieve this kind of RLS. We can only apply dynamic row level filter to limit access based on "1 to 1" mapping which can be achieved with LOOKUPVALUE(). However, we can't have this dynamic security across more than two tables.
For example, you can get the Org ID based on accessing user. Then you can still get another column value with LOOKUPVALUE() based on these "filtered" Org ID. But you can't go any further to map next column.
Regards,
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Prices go up Feb. 11th.
Check out the January 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features in Reporting, Modeling, and Data Connectivity.
User | Count |
---|---|
145 | |
87 | |
66 | |
52 | |
45 |
User | Count |
---|---|
215 | |
90 | |
83 | |
66 | |
58 |