The ultimate Microsoft Fabric, Power BI, Azure AI, and SQL learning event: Join us in Stockholm, September 24-27, 2024.
Save €200 with code MSCUST on top of early bird pricing!
Find everything you need to get certified on Fabric—skills challenges, live sessions, exam prep, role guidance, and more. Get started
Background: I have a number of files each containing different levels of progress as based on manhours earned quantity as a portion of that budgeted (this is the measure titled "AGP % Comp" = DIVIDE([Tot. Earned Mhrs],[Tot. Budgeted Mhrs]). So, for say the "2011.05.23 MM" file, a total of 12,566.73 Mhrs were earned out of 171,079.81 budgeted....or 7.35%
All file data is contained within a single fact table with the file name column ("MM Version") the distinguishing dimension for each set of associated facts. This table is linked to a Lookup Table containing all "MM Versions", which also contains an Index column for sorting purposes.
What I am trying to do is populate the "AGP % Progress" column with [AGP % Complete] variances for that of the current row to the one before it. E.G. the value in row 5 should be 13.56% (31.97 - 18.41).
I've tried to accomplish this is various ways, including that of using EARLIER() within a measure with use of an interator and second FILTER to create a secondary loop for EARLIER to reference, however, this approach -CALCULATE([AGP % Comp],FILTER('MM Version',COUNTROWS(FILTER('(L) MM Version',EARLIER('MM Version'[MM Version])<='MM Version'[MM Version]))))- returns identical results to that of the "AGP % Comp" column while going with -CALCULATE([AGP % Comp],FILTER(ALL('MM Version'),COUNTROWS(FILTER('(L) MM Version',EARLIER('MM Version'[MM Version])<='MM Version'[MM Version]))))- yields the results displayed in "AGP % Progress Cumm" colum on the far right.
I am having no luck in getting it to reference the previous row's context (MM file version). Any input is greatly appreciated. I have a hunch that part of the issue is that we're dealing with text values here...if so, perhaps referencing the associated Index column could be the key?
Here's is the summary table:
Thanks in advance for any constructive input!
Regards,
Igor
Solved! Go to Solution.
You have an index column, well using this you can get the previous value:
PrevValue = VAR previndex = VALUES ( Table1[Index] ) - 1 RETURN CALCULATE ( SUM ( Table1[Value] ) ) - CALCULATE ( SUM ( Table1[Value] ), FILTER ( ALL ( Table1 ), Table1[Index] = previndex ) )
Modified this to your tables and measures.
You have an index column, well using this you can get the previous value:
PrevValue = VAR previndex = VALUES ( Table1[Index] ) - 1 RETURN CALCULATE ( SUM ( Table1[Value] ) ) - CALCULATE ( SUM ( Table1[Value] ), FILTER ( ALL ( Table1 ), Table1[Index] = previndex ) )
Modified this to your tables and measures.
Victor,
I started learning PowerPivot/DAX last December, and at some point along that road I came across this article by Alberto Ferrari
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/variables-in-dax/
However, at that time I hadn't the slightest clue what he was talking about. I had long since forgotten about that article ... then you come along and reintroduce me to DAX variables; thank you sir. This is significantly more useful than solving this particular issue 🙂
On another note, I am still very much curious how EARLIER() functions might be effectively implemented in this instance, so if you or anyone else has any words of wisdom, I would greatly appreciate it.
Cheers,
IG
Join the community in Stockholm for expert Microsoft Fabric learning including a very exciting keynote from Arun Ulag, Corporate Vice President, Azure Data.
Check out the August 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Learn from experts, get hands-on experience, and win awesome prizes.
User | Count |
---|---|
110 | |
80 | |
77 | |
46 | |
39 |
User | Count |
---|---|
141 | |
110 | |
64 | |
64 | |
53 |