Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowJuly 7 - July 17 | Round 2 of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships. Don't miss your chance! Learn more
I want to compare the average FTE from the whole company vs FTE for a specific team, but i ran into a problem when using row level security .
A member of a specific team can only access data for his specific team so i used row level security to implement this.
But this also overrules my ALL function to show the average of the whole company.
Example below:
Correct After row level security
| Company wide | Team A | Company wide | Team A | ||
| 4% | 3% | 3% | 3% |
Is there a solution for this problem?
Solved! Go to Solution.
The only solution to the problem is to create static measures or a separate table where you hold certain, company-wide metrics/aggregations/calculations. This separate table should not be tied to RLS and then you can use the aggregated metrics in that table in your calculations. This way, they cannot see everything except the particular corporate-wide metrics that you make available.
so lets say i have a seperate table with only measures. would that be the same thing you are referring to when you say
"a separate table where you hold certain, company-wide metrics/aggregations/calculations"
If no, could you explain a little more
The only solution to the problem is to create static measures or a separate table where you hold certain, company-wide metrics/aggregations/calculations. This separate table should not be tied to RLS and then you can use the aggregated metrics in that table in your calculations. This way, they cannot see everything except the particular corporate-wide metrics that you make available.
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Join Fabric Data Days 2026: 60 days of free live/on-demand sessions, challenges, study groups, and certification opportunities.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 23 | |
| 19 | |
| 18 | |
| 17 | |
| 13 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 60 | |
| 52 | |
| 47 | |
| 40 | |
| 38 |