Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Next up in the FabCon + SQLCon recap series: The roadmap for Microsoft SQL and Maximizing Developer experiences in Fabric. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now

Reply
woutertom
Regular Visitor

Resolving ambiguity issue

Hi there,

 

I am fairly new to the BI environment and I am looking to do the following (this is a simplification of the model): 

 

TABLE A (factbased):

Product category | sales value 

 

TABLE B (factbased): 

Page category | sessions 

 

TABLE C (Lookup table): 

product category (UID)

 

TABLE D (Lookup table): 

Page category (UID)) | product category 

 

Now here comes the tricky part. In table C, there's 2 different product categories (product A, product B). In table D, these two products are taken together (Product A & Product B). Ideally, one should of course split that column in table D, making one for Product A and one for Product B. This however, is not possible at the moment, and the aim is not to change this. The aim the following display situation: 

 

- display of sales value (from table A)

- display of sessions (from table B) 

- sliced up per product category (from table C)

 

We want the following to happen, if someone sliced the data on product A, the 'sales value' for product A is shown. If someone slices the data for product B, the 'sales value for product B is shown. For sessions, we would like to see the following: When sliced on product A, the sessions for product A & product B are shown. When sliced for product B, the sessions for product A & B are shown. 

 

Is there someone who could help me out on this matter. Initially, my idea was to create another lookuptable between C & D, table E, that has the following: 

 

TABLE E: 

Product A & B 

Not product A & B

 

And then add these labels to the C & D tables. But... an 'ambiguity error' occurred. Is there any way to work around this in a more efficient way, or can we maybe create a solution using DAX to work around this? 

 

Hope someone understands the problem and can help me out with this! 

 

 

2 REPLIES 2
v-huizhn-msft
Microsoft Employee
Microsoft Employee

Hi @woutertom,

Please respond me if you want to resolve your issue. If you got solution by other ways, welcome to share it, so that more people will get helpful information from here.

Thanks,
Angelia

v-huizhn-msft
Microsoft Employee
Microsoft Employee

Hi @woutertom,

It's hard to reproduce your scenario based on your description, is there relationship between them? could you please create dummy sample table and list the expected result for better analyzing.

Thanks,
Angelia

Helpful resources

Announcements
New to Fabric survey Carousel

New to Fabric Survey

If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.

Power BI DataViz World Championships carousel

Power BI DataViz World Championships - June 2026

A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.

March Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Community Update - March 2026

Check out the March 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.