Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-600) exam for FREE! Find out how by watching the DP-600 session on-demand now through April 28th.
Learn moreJoin the FabCon + SQLCon recap series. Up next: Power BI, Real-Time Intelligence, IQ and AI, and Data Factory take center stage. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Hi,
I have two tables but they aren't in a direct relation (just an inactive). Is there a possibility to get the Related Function into action even without direct relation?
Thanks a lot.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @amitchandak
The Relationship meets at another table. But I figured out there was another table i could make a relation with (a date table) and after that, i used the relatedtable function with sumx and that worked out with a charm. But good to know: userelationship.
Hi @PaulDBrown
Thanks for the reply. Since I could use the relatedtable function with sumx, everything works fine. But that's a great way with a virtual table.
Hi @Anonymous ,
According to your description, I created two unrelated tables:
Here are the steps you can follow:
1. Create calculated column. Use the relatedtable function in table2 to calculate the amount in the table
Column = SUMX(RELATEDTABLE('Table'),'Table'[amount])2. Result
Best Regards,
Liu Yang
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @amitchandak
The Relationship meets at another table. But I figured out there was another table i could make a relation with (a date table) and after that, i used the relatedtable function with sumx and that worked out with a charm. But good to know: userelationship.
Hi @PaulDBrown
Thanks for the reply. Since I could use the relatedtable function with sumx, everything works fine. But that's a great way with a virtual table.
@Anonymous
You can create a virtual relaionship bewteen two unrelated tables using the TREATAS function as the filter expressions. For example, say you had two unrelated tables:
Table 1
| Country ID | Forecast |
|
US |
100 |
| Japan | 110 |
| UK | 120 |
| Germany | 130 |
Table 2
| Country ID | Sales |
|
Japan |
95 |
| Germany | 75 |
| US | 105 |
| UK | 95 |
You could create the following measures:
1)
Sum of sales = SUM(Table2[Sales])
2)
Sum of Forecast = SUM(Table1[Forecast])
3)
Sales (TREATAS) = CALCULATE([Sum of Sales],
TREATAS(VALUES(Table1[Country ID]), Table2[Country ID))
Then create a visual using the field Table1[Country ID] and the [Sum of Forecast] and [Sales (TREATAS)] and both would be filtered by the Country ID.
Make sense?
Proud to be a Super User!
Paul on Linkedin.
@Anonymous , Why the relationship is inactive?
You can activate it using userelationship https://radacad.com/userelationship-or-role-playing-dimension-dealing-with-inactive-relationships-in-power-bi
related need active relation
Can you share sample data and sample output in table format? Or a sample pbix after removing sensitive data.
Check out the April 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 42 | |
| 35 | |
| 35 | |
| 22 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 65 | |
| 58 | |
| 28 | |
| 27 | |
| 25 |