The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends September 15. Request your voucher.
I am using a redshift database, and I can connect to that OK in Power BI Desktop. My problem comes when I try to use some calculated fields; I have simplified some down to try and find the error so for example:
Measure 2 = COUNT(evhc[flag])
Where flag is an integer. This give the error:
OLE DB or ODBC error: [Expression.Error] We couldn't fold the expression to the data source. Please try a simpler expression.
I assume that when folding this query that Power BI is using SQL syntax rather than Redshift?
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
p.s. I know I can do this without using a measure, but this is a test as my measures are more complex than this.
Solved! Go to Solution.
@DrBiker I'm assuming you are connecting to RedShift in DirectQuery mode. This error is thrown when some aggregation (in this case the count) is been translated to M for execution, so it's not really SQL yet.
I think this is related to a bug that we know about, is [flag] a nullable column? Counting on nullable column wasn't working in the preview bits, we will be fixing it in the next release.
Has this been resolved?
@DrBiker I'm assuming you are connecting to RedShift in DirectQuery mode. This error is thrown when some aggregation (in this case the count) is been translated to M for execution, so it's not really SQL yet.
I think this is related to a bug that we know about, is [flag] a nullable column? Counting on nullable column wasn't working in the preview bits, we will be fixing it in the next release.
@pqian is right, this should be fixed in the next release (~end of august). Thanks
Hi,
I am getting the same error message (although different DAX formula!!!
Is this fixed or not?
Thank you!
Redshift is in preview mode, so I guess it is a bug. Send a frown using the desktop frown so the developers can look at it.
User | Count |
---|---|
69 | |
65 | |
63 | |
55 | |
28 |
User | Count |
---|---|
112 | |
81 | |
65 | |
48 | |
43 |