This time we’re going bigger than ever. Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more. We're covering it all. You won't want to miss it.
Learn moreDid you hear? There's a new SQL AI Developer certification (DP-800). Start preparing now and be one of the first to get certified. Register now
@ankita_7 would you mind sharing how you connected your Kronos data? Was it using the REST API an if so how did you do this?
HI @ankita_7,
I think this should more be related to your relationships, they linked tables with so many fields and different types of filter directions.
You can take a look at following link about how AS tabular data model relationships mapping if it helps:
Relationships in analysis services tabular models
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
@ankita_7 , refer for RLS
https://community.powerbi.com/t5/MBAS-Gallery/Microsoft-Power-BI-Unleash-row-level-security-patterns...
https://radacad.com/dynamic-row-level-security-with-organizational-hierarchy-power-bi
https://www.blue-granite.com/blog/using-dynamic-row-level-security-with-organizational-hierarchies
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/service-admin-rls
https://blog.tallan.com/2018/04/10/row-level-security-in-power-bi-part-1-roles-and-users/
https://radacad.com/what-do-you-need-to-implement-dynamic-row-level-security-in-power-bi
Avoid bi-directional join
Hi @ankita_7 ,
Just wanted to check are you trying to implement Dynamic RLS?
If yes, in a way you should avoid bi-directional relationships and use DAX expression to implement RLS.
Check the following link which explains how we can avoid bi-directional relationship in RLS and implement it using DAX:
https://radacad.com/dynamic-row-level-security-with-organizational-hierarchy-power-bi
Thanks,
Pragati
Check out the April 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Sign up to receive a private message when registration opens and key events begin.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 34 | |
| 32 | |
| 25 | |
| 21 | |
| 16 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 61 | |
| 49 | |
| 28 | |
| 23 | |
| 23 |