Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers!
Enter the sweepstakes now!See when key Fabric features will launch and what’s already live, all in one place and always up to date. Explore the new Fabric roadmap
I have some simple questions regarding power bi report performance.
I'm interested in if the number of report pages and number of slicers / bookmarks associated with a page are affecting performance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @mike12345
Your questions cannot be answered as "black and white" , like most power bi masters speaking when it comes to performance issues "it depends...".
Regarding pages, it really depends on the types of graphs you have there. The more "interactive" the graph is, the more resources are required.
Maps and graphs with animations, for example, consume a lot of resources.
As for bookmarks, there is a limit of up to 20 in any case; this depends on what is in them, so it may be worth considering a page navigator to move between pages.
Recent versions have developed this feature.
A regular slicer or a Chiselet the same chislet is more interactive and has the ability to add images so it will need more resources.
The filter consumes fewer resources than the slicer.
Since it's really required to check by your report, I'm attaching links to more information on these topics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkIXtvU1AiM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lfeW9283vA
If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly
Hi @mike12345
Your questions cannot be answered as "black and white" , like most power bi masters speaking when it comes to performance issues "it depends...".
Regarding pages, it really depends on the types of graphs you have there. The more "interactive" the graph is, the more resources are required.
Maps and graphs with animations, for example, consume a lot of resources.
As for bookmarks, there is a limit of up to 20 in any case; this depends on what is in them, so it may be worth considering a page navigator to move between pages.
Recent versions have developed this feature.
A regular slicer or a Chiselet the same chislet is more interactive and has the ability to add images so it will need more resources.
The filter consumes fewer resources than the slicer.
Since it's really required to check by your report, I'm attaching links to more information on these topics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkIXtvU1AiM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lfeW9283vA
If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
74 | |
71 | |
58 | |
55 |
User | Count |
---|---|
41 | |
39 | |
34 | |
32 | |
30 |