Learn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @nguyenk172 ,
The formula you are using needs to be split and cannot be equal to one data and then directly equal to another value.
Refer the following sample ,as you provided:
Type1 =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB",
"UC4BATCH"
&& PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "ZB",
"Z1", "SPA",
"Spot PO"
)
Get:
And after adjust:
Type =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& ( PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"
|| PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH" )
&& ( PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "ZB"
|| PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "Z1" ), "SPA",
"Spot PO"
)
Output:
And according your provided data,you need to adjust to the below:
Type1 =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& (PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"||PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH"
)
&& (PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "ZB"||PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART]= "Z1")
, "SPA",
NOT ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& (PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"||PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH"),
"Auto Calloff",
NOT ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& (NOT PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"||NOT PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH"),
"Buyer Intervention",
"Spot PO"
)
Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!
Best Regards
Lucien
Hi @nguyenk172 ,
The formula you are using needs to be split and cannot be equal to one data and then directly equal to another value.
Refer the following sample ,as you provided:
Type1 =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB",
"UC4BATCH"
&& PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "ZB",
"Z1", "SPA",
"Spot PO"
)
Get:
And after adjust:
Type =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& ( PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"
|| PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH" )
&& ( PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "ZB"
|| PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "Z1" ), "SPA",
"Spot PO"
)
Output:
And according your provided data,you need to adjust to the below:
Type1 =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& (PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"||PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH"
)
&& (PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART] = "ZB"||PurchaseOrders[DocumentType_BSART]= "Z1")
, "SPA",
NOT ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& (PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"||PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH"),
"Auto Calloff",
NOT ISBLANK ( PurchaseOrders[Agreement_KONNR] )
&& (NOT PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "BATCHJOB"||NOT PurchaseOrders[CreatedBy_ERNAM] = "UC4BATCH"),
"Buyer Intervention",
"Spot PO"
)
Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!
Best Regards
Lucien
Hi,
Found your question interesting and I came up with the following. Hope it helps and at the very least, points you to the right direction to get your formula working.
Assign Status =
VAR _checkAgreement = IF ( MAX ( Purchases[AgreementID] ) = "-", TRUE(),FALSE())
VAR _checkCreated = OR ( MAX (Purchases[CreatedBy])="BATCHJOB", MAX(Purchases[CreatedBy])="UC4BATCH")
VAR _checkDocType = OR ( MAX (Purchases[DocumentType])="Z1", MAX(Purchases[DocumentType])="ZB")
VAR _status =
SWITCH(TRUE(),
_checkAgreement && _checkCreated && _checkDocType, "SPA",
_checkAgreement = FALSE() && _checkCreated, "Auto Calloff",
_checkAgreement = FALSE() && _checkCreated = FALSE(),"Buyer Intervention",
"Spot PO"
)
RETURN
_status
Link to example PBIX for reference - SWITCH example
I had some trouble with the ISBLANK() function so I substituted "-" into the data as a check to save time.
Example table and results to check logic:-
Hi @nguyenk172 ,
Looks some issue in switch conditions, Could you please share the sample data in text format with expected output?
Thanks,
Samarth
Best Regards,
Samarth
If this post helps, please consider accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Appreciate your Kudos!!
Connect on Linkedin
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 51 | |
| 39 | |
| 29 | |
| 19 | |
| 17 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 66 | |
| 57 | |
| 41 | |
| 21 | |
| 19 |