Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
Hi guys,
I'm having trouble creating a logic for the pareto chart, here's the example:
I need to create a measure so that in cases where the (% acc) is below 80% I can take the next value above 80% and make a filter with it.
Bellow the expected result:
As you can see, if I were to plot the pareto at 80%, my maximum value would be 76.20%, however, I need that in those cases where the value does not reach 80%, the measure created should take the next value above 80%.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @rminto73 ,
According to my understanding, if the set value ——80% cannot be found in the aac% column, then it will be displayed: all values less than 80% and the first value greater than 80%,right?
You could use:
Measure =
VAR _flag =
IF ( 0.8 IN ALL ( 'Table'[% acc] ), TRUE (), FALSE () )
VAR _first =
MINX ( FILTER ( ALL ( 'Table' ), 'Table'[% acc] > 0.8 ), [% acc] )
RETURN
IF (
_flag = TRUE ()
&& MAX ( 'Table'[% acc] ) <= 0.8,
1,
IF ( _flag = FALSE () && MAX ( 'Table'[% acc] ) <= _first, 1, 0 )
)
After applying it to visual-level filter pane, the final output is shown below:
Best Regards,
Eyelyn Qin
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @rminto73 ,
According to my understanding, if the set value ——80% cannot be found in the aac% column, then it will be displayed: all values less than 80% and the first value greater than 80%,right?
You could use:
Measure =
VAR _flag =
IF ( 0.8 IN ALL ( 'Table'[% acc] ), TRUE (), FALSE () )
VAR _first =
MINX ( FILTER ( ALL ( 'Table' ), 'Table'[% acc] > 0.8 ), [% acc] )
RETURN
IF (
_flag = TRUE ()
&& MAX ( 'Table'[% acc] ) <= 0.8,
1,
IF ( _flag = FALSE () && MAX ( 'Table'[% acc] ) <= _first, 1, 0 )
)
After applying it to visual-level filter pane, the final output is shown below:
Best Regards,
Eyelyn Qin
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi,
Please correct me if I understood wrongly.
If there are not matching values with 80%, then you want to show the result with one more value that is the lowest value of above 80%s, right?
If I may suggest, please try to create VAR inside the measure, which indicates the lowest rank among over 80%s. Then, you can calculate or describe the outcome until that rank.
The VAR might look something like the below.
VAR minimumrankingaboveeighty% =
Calculate (MINX (virtual-ranking-percentage-table, rank), percentage-column >= 80%)
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 38 | |
| 36 | |
| 33 | |
| 31 | |
| 28 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 129 | |
| 88 | |
| 79 | |
| 68 | |
| 63 |