The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends September 15. Request your voucher.
Hi all,
I have a bit of experience with both sql and power query and I was wondering what uses less computing power and bandwidth: querying with SQL or power query.
For example if I was going to select dog type, dog cost and dog breed from a million row DB for the time range 2017 to now, is it roughly the same time and power to do this with power query and SQL? are there positives and negatives Im not aware of?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
When connecting to SQL DB, Power Query tries to do Query Folding and tries to push maximum logics to data source, means the time take in Power Query and SQL will be the same in such cases. In your example, ideally Power Query should just trigger a SQL with a where clause for the time filter. You can see this by checking "View Native Query" option.
In case you do some transformations which PQ cannot convert to SQL, then it will take more time to process, since PQ has to bring in all the data and do the Transofrmation on its side.
When connecting to SQL DB, Power Query tries to do Query Folding and tries to push maximum logics to data source, means the time take in Power Query and SQL will be the same in such cases. In your example, ideally Power Query should just trigger a SQL with a where clause for the time filter. You can see this by checking "View Native Query" option.
In case you do some transformations which PQ cannot convert to SQL, then it will take more time to process, since PQ has to bring in all the data and do the Transofrmation on its side.
User | Count |
---|---|
69 | |
69 | |
66 | |
54 | |
28 |
User | Count |
---|---|
112 | |
82 | |
66 | |
48 | |
43 |