March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
Hi,
I have created a dashboard with custom visual python plots with 5 slicers/filters. Now both desktop and report are taking lots of tiime to load with every filter change (30sec to 1min) for each plots.
I have optimized all the codes to basic level ( removed all the power querry and loops in the code) but still facing the same issue.
Suggestions will be much appreciated.
Thanks alot in advance.
Shabham
Hi @shubhamgoswami ,
1. Quite often slow queries often relate to poorly written measures.
You can use DAX Studio to run traces against your measures in your data model to find the issue
https://daxstudio.codeplex.com/
2. Also you can take a look at this blog: http://radacad.com/performance-tip-for-power-bi-enable-load-sucks-memory-up
3. Try to run the latest Power BI desktop version: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45331.
Hi @v-diye-msft
Thanks a lot for your suggestions.
I have already tried all th above options but still I am facing the same issue.
Not only the report file, even PBI desktop is also taking lots of time to load.
Your help would be much appreciable.
Shubham
Hi @shubhamgoswami ,
Please kindly refer to the official article:
For a deeper dive into which visuals are taking up the most time and resources, you can connect SQL Profiler to Power BI Desktop to get all full view of query performance.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
124 | |
89 | |
84 | |
70 | |
51 |
User | Count |
---|---|
206 | |
146 | |
97 | |
79 | |
69 |