Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
Hi,
How to ignore page level filter when, ALL, VALUES, REMOVEFILTERS, KEEPFILTERS, TREATAS, ALLEXCEPT, TREATEAS, and ALLSELECTED can't ignore it?!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Omega ,
Thanks for reaching out to the Microsoft fabric community forum.
Thanks for your prompt response
Workaround implemented:
To solve this, I’ve used a disconnected slicer table
I have uploaded the PBIX file here for your reference.
If you’re still experiencing any issues, please feel free to let us know we’ll be happy to assist you further.
Looking forward to your response.
If this post helped resolve your issue, please consider marking it as the Accepted Solution. Doing so not only acknowledges the support provided but also helps other community members find relevant solutions more easily.
We appreciate your engagement and thank you for being an active part of the community.
Best regards,
LakshmiNarayana.
Hi @Omega ,
Thanks for reaching out to the Microsoft fabric community forum.
Thanks for your prompt response
Workaround implemented:
To solve this, I’ve used a disconnected slicer table
I have uploaded the PBIX file here for your reference.
If you’re still experiencing any issues, please feel free to let us know we’ll be happy to assist you further.
Looking forward to your response.
If this post helped resolve your issue, please consider marking it as the Accepted Solution. Doing so not only acknowledges the support provided but also helps other community members find relevant solutions more easily.
We appreciate your engagement and thank you for being an active part of the community.
Best regards,
LakshmiNarayana.
Hi @Omega ,
If your issue has been resolved, please consider marking the most helpful reply as the accepted solution. This helps other community members who may encounter the same issue to find answers more efficiently.
If you're still facing challenges, feel free to let us know we’ll be glad to assist you further.
Looking forward to your response.
Best regards,
LakshmiNarayana.
I have used page filters and used ALL, it worked for me.
Not sure these links will help:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/understanding-dax-auto-exist/
https://forum.enterprisedna.co/t/delinking-page-filters-on-few-visuals/7271/4
Could you share the model diagram, page filters, dax that you tried... sometimes, we may have to use all(dimtable) too in combination of all(fact table).
If ALL, REMOVEFILTERS, VALUES, KEEPFILTERS, ALLEXCEPT, TREATAS, and ALLSELECTED can't help you ignore a Page-Level filter, then you're facing a scenario where DAX cannot override the page-level filter because it is already being enforced at the visualization layer before DAX is evaluated.
Page-level filters are enforced by the Power BI engine before your DAX code executes. This means DAX can't override or "see beyond" them — not even with functions like ALL or REMOVEFILTERS.
Solution 1: Move the page-level filter to a slicer (visual-level filtering)
If your goal is to exclude a certain visual from being affected:
Solution 2. Use a Disconnected Table (if you want selective control)
You can create a disconnected filter table that mimics the original column:
DisconnectedDate = DISTINCT('Calendar'[Date])Then, create a measure using TREATAS():
Custom Measure =
CALCULATE(
[Your Measure],
TREATAS(VALUES('DisconnectedDate'[Date]), 'Calendar'[Date])
)
This bypasses the regular relationship-based filtering — and thus ignores any page-level filters applied to Calendar[Date].
If you found the above information helpful, I’d appreciate it if you could give us a Kudos and mark the response as the Accepted Solution.
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 44 | |
| 40 | |
| 33 | |
| 31 | |
| 23 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 127 | |
| 116 | |
| 90 | |
| 73 | |
| 69 |