This time we’re going bigger than ever. Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more. We're covering it all. You won't want to miss it.
Learn moreLevel up your Power BI skills this month - build one visual each week and tell better stories with data! Get started
Hi,
I've uploaded my pbix file here -> https://ufile.io/dsp0vngv . I have the following data:
And two calculated measures:
Which I've displayed in the visuation table below:
What I don't understand is that for answer c the below line of code is not overriding the existing filter context? i.e. why is every line of the above table visualisation not 5 for the answer d column? I thought the FILTER function leaves the existing filter context intact but then overrides any filter context where a filter is defined within the FILTER function?
@Anonymous
I believe this is to the behavior of ALL. I've found ALLEXCEPT to supply a solution for most of these situations. It will remove implicit and explicit filters, with exception those applied ot the columns secified in the expression.
You can also try creating a custom table to see the result of your filter.
filter ( filter ( your filter in the calculate ) , the implicit filters of the visual )
Sign up to receive a private message when registration opens and key events begin.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 33 | |
| 25 | |
| 23 | |
| 20 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 64 | |
| 41 | |
| 27 | |
| 22 | |
| 20 |