Supplies are limited. Contact info@espc.tech right away to save your spot before the conference sells out.
Get your discountScore big with last-minute savings on the final tickets to FabCon Vienna. Secure your discount
I have an issue when using COUNTX () with the ALL() function. The value returned is the actual number of rows plus one. I've verified this with a bunch of tables, and I've got a solution, specifically using the ALLNOBLANKROW() function instead of ALL(). What I don't know is why this is necessary or if this is a proper pattern to use for solving counting all the rows that meet a particular condition. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
This DAX returns the correct answer, but I don't know why or if this is a correct pattern to use.
All Requirements without User Stories = VAR counter = COUNTX( ALLNOBLANKROW('Requirement'), IF( [Count of Related User Stories] < 1, 1, BLANK() ) ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK (counter), 0, counter )
This DAX returns a number that is the correct number plus one. Why?
All Requirements without User Stories = VAR counter = COUNTX( ALL('Requirement'), IF( [Count of Related User Stories] < 1, 1, BLANK() ) ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK (counter), 0, counter )
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @gaccardo
You may refer to ALLNOBLANKROW Function and ALL Function. Here is the article for you. Show a sample as below:
We can get the correct count of rows with ALLNOBLANKROW Function as it returns all rows but the blank row from the parent table of a relationship.
Regards,
Cherie
Hi @gaccardo
You may refer to ALLNOBLANKROW Function and ALL Function. Here is the article for you. Show a sample as below:
We can get the correct count of rows with ALLNOBLANKROW Function as it returns all rows but the blank row from the parent table of a relationship.
Regards,
Cherie
Thank you @v-cherch-msft. That was an excellent explanation and a very informative article.