The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends September 15. Request your voucher.
I have an issue when using COUNTX () with the ALL() function. The value returned is the actual number of rows plus one. I've verified this with a bunch of tables, and I've got a solution, specifically using the ALLNOBLANKROW() function instead of ALL(). What I don't know is why this is necessary or if this is a proper pattern to use for solving counting all the rows that meet a particular condition. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
This DAX returns the correct answer, but I don't know why or if this is a correct pattern to use.
All Requirements without User Stories = VAR counter = COUNTX( ALLNOBLANKROW('Requirement'), IF( [Count of Related User Stories] < 1, 1, BLANK() ) ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK (counter), 0, counter )
This DAX returns a number that is the correct number plus one. Why?
All Requirements without User Stories = VAR counter = COUNTX( ALL('Requirement'), IF( [Count of Related User Stories] < 1, 1, BLANK() ) ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK (counter), 0, counter )
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @gaccardo
You may refer to ALLNOBLANKROW Function and ALL Function. Here is the article for you. Show a sample as below:
We can get the correct count of rows with ALLNOBLANKROW Function as it returns all rows but the blank row from the parent table of a relationship.
Regards,
Cherie
Hi @gaccardo
You may refer to ALLNOBLANKROW Function and ALL Function. Here is the article for you. Show a sample as below:
We can get the correct count of rows with ALLNOBLANKROW Function as it returns all rows but the blank row from the parent table of a relationship.
Regards,
Cherie
Thank you @v-cherch-msft. That was an excellent explanation and a very informative article.
User | Count |
---|---|
68 | |
63 | |
59 | |
54 | |
28 |
User | Count |
---|---|
181 | |
82 | |
63 | |
47 | |
43 |