Forum Discussion

Mona01's avatar
Mona01
Frequent Visitor
7 years ago
Solved

Nested Calculate to compute Simple moving Average

Hi, I am new in Dax. I am just going through an article which compute simple moving average.
As per my understanding, it is a calculated column So there is a row context. So the VALUES(SMoving[DayNumber]) have a value of current row.


That query will give me a filter rows on which sum have been calculated.

Savrage= CALCULATE (
sum ( SMoving[Close]),
SMoving[DayNumber] >= VALUES ( SMoving[DayNumber] ) - 3,
SMoving[DayNumber] <= VALUES ( SMoving[Date] )
)

But it is not working. the correct query is given below. Can anyone tell what is happning here.

Savrage= CALCULATE

(    

CALCULATE (        AVERAGE ( Prices[Close] ),        Prices[DayNumber] >= VALUES ( Prices[DayNumber] ) - 3,        Prices[DayNumber] <= VALUES ( Prices[DayNumber] )   ),   ALLEXCEPT ( Prices, Prices[Stock], Prices[DayNumber] ))

  • Hi Mona01

     

    VALUES( ) is not be affected by row context, only by filter context. If you use VALUES( Table1[Column1] ) directly in a calculated column, you will get a one-column table with the unique values in Table1[Column1], since there is no filter context. 

     

    In the second example that you show, the outermost CALCULATE however converts the row context into a filter context through context transition. In this way, when VALUES( ) is evaluated, there is a filter context that actually filters the current row (and its duplicates, if there are any) and therefore VALUES ( Prices[DayNumber] ) will return the value of Prices[DayNumber] in the current row.      

     

    You might want to take a look at this and this articles by the Italian gurus. 

2 Replies

  • AlB's avatar
    AlB
    Community Champion

    Hi Mona01

     

    VALUES( ) is not be affected by row context, only by filter context. If you use VALUES( Table1[Column1] ) directly in a calculated column, you will get a one-column table with the unique values in Table1[Column1], since there is no filter context. 

     

    In the second example that you show, the outermost CALCULATE however converts the row context into a filter context through context transition. In this way, when VALUES( ) is evaluated, there is a filter context that actually filters the current row (and its duplicates, if there are any) and therefore VALUES ( Prices[DayNumber] ) will return the value of Prices[DayNumber] in the current row.      

     

    You might want to take a look at this and this articles by the Italian gurus. 

    • Mona01's avatar
      Mona01
      Frequent Visitor

      I would like to know regarding the above query .the below dax is also used calculate and data is also filtring why there is no filter context.

       

      Savrage= CALCULATE (
      sum ( SMoving[Close]),
      SMoving[DayNumber] >= VALUES ( SMoving[DayNumber] ) - 3,
      SMoving[DayNumber] <= VALUES ( SMoving[Date] )
      ).

       

      for 2nd query

       

       CALCULATE

      (    

      CALCULATE (        AVERAGE ( Prices[Close] ),        Prices[DayNumber] >= VALUES ( Prices[DayNumber] ) - 3,        Prices[DayNumber] <= VALUES ( Prices[DayNumber] )   ),   ALLEXCEPT ( Prices, Prices[Stock], Prices[DayNumber] ))

       

      If we remove ALLEXCEPT ( Prices, Prices[Stock], Prices[DayNumber] ) function . what happen

       

      what is the differnce when calculate use with no filter parameter Vs ALLEXCEPT