The ultimate Microsoft Fabric, Power BI, Azure AI, and SQL learning event: Join us in Stockholm, September 24-27, 2024.
Save €200 with code MSCUST on top of early bird pricing!
Find everything you need to get certified on Fabric—skills challenges, live sessions, exam prep, role guidance, and more. Get started
Hello,
Could you please advise a good method to name fields in analytical data modeling?
For example, I have CustomerID in Customers and Orders tables.
In production database these names are the same (CustomerID in Customers and the same in Orders).
In analytical datamodel I want to differentiate these Ids, because it gets very confusing (at least to me).
For example, several approaches.
Customers-CustomerID and Orders-CustomerID
Another approach
CustomerID.Customers and CustomerID.Orders
In another words, I want to preserve the table name (full resolution), and in some cases even database name, like CustomerID.Customers.Accounting and CustomerID.Customers.Marketing
Otherwise it is getting pretty confusing in reports to understand to what database, table or file this field is from.
Maybe I'm on a wrong path here? Any suggestions or links to common practice would be appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @vyacheslavg,
This video from Ruth Puzuelo might help..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9k864FRg44&list=TLGG1xRQj2CNWg4xMTA1MjAxNw
Dave
Hi @vyacheslavg,
This video from Ruth Puzuelo might help..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9k864FRg44&list=TLGG1xRQj2CNWg4xMTA1MjAxNw
Dave
Hi Dave,
this is great.
It shows that PBI master is using the same technique for something in her workflow.
And there is even the M function to simplify this stuff.
Very useful indeed, thanks.
Join the community in Stockholm for expert Microsoft Fabric learning including a very exciting keynote from Arun Ulag, Corporate Vice President, Azure Data.
Check out the August 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
109 | |
79 | |
72 | |
48 | |
39 |
User | Count |
---|---|
138 | |
108 | |
69 | |
64 | |
57 |