March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
I have a data modelling question, which I hope you will help me figure out. I am new to data modelling in BI, so please consider this.
I have a feeling this might be relatively straight-forward for more experienced users.
I have a database with a record of dishes in table Dish. Each dish has some characteristics: name, price, amount of pasta etc.
They also have a Pasta Type and a Pasta Type Group. The relationships between these seem to be circular.
The thinking is, that each dish can have a certain Pasta Type that it has to be made with. If no Pasta Type is present, there may be a Pasta Type Group, that the dish has to be made with.
Both Pasta Type and Pasta Type Group are nullable in the Dish table. They don't have to have a value.
If a dish entry has both Pasta Type and Pasta Type Group set (to not null), the most detailed information, Pasta Type, will win.
Pasta Types could be: 'Fettucine', 'Spaghetti', 'Tagliatelle' etc. Pasta Type Groups could be 'Tubes', 'Ribbons', 'Shapes', but also 'Whole-grain', 'Gluten-free' etc.
There exists a many-to-many relationship between tables Pasta Type and Pasta Type Group.
Below is an overview of the database. I have inserted a value 'None' for each dish if both Pasta Type and Pasta Type Group is null:
I have modelled this currently with a fact table covering the dishes made on a certain date.
Each dish has both a pastaTypeId and a pastaTypeGroupId. Both can be null/not defined.
Like this:
I would like a hierachy based on Pasta Type Group and Pasta Type, such that I can make a visual like this:
Since each Pasta Type can be a member of many Pasta Type Groups, I am struggling with creating a circular relationship like in the database above.
This however, gives me None in Pasta Type:
Moreover, I have added reference table and a duplicate Pasta Type table to the Pasta Type Group table like this:
But this means, that my summations of amount of pasta is not correct for the Pasta Types:
Any help on how to model this hierachy is appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
It sounds like Pasta Type Group should be a parent dimension of Pasta. Are there instances of Pasta that are not part of a group?
Moreover it sounds like dish should be a standalone table, not linked to either Pasta or Pasta Group, since there is no strict dependency.
Hi,
Share some data and show the expected result.
It sounds like Pasta Type Group should be a parent dimension of Pasta. Are there instances of Pasta that are not part of a group?
Moreover it sounds like dish should be a standalone table, not linked to either Pasta or Pasta Group, since there is no strict dependency.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
124 | |
89 | |
84 | |
70 | |
51 |
User | Count |
---|---|
206 | |
143 | |
97 | |
79 | |
68 |