Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, dataviz contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Get registeredJoin us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM. Register now.
I dont think this is possible, but i was wondering if it is, ive looked round but cant find an example of it being or not being possible
Merge 1 with 2
Table 1
| Staff ID | Department ID |
| 1 | a |
| 2 | c |
| null | b |
Table 2
| Staff ID | Depatment ID | Location |
| 1 | a | Scotland |
| 2 | c | Wales |
| 3 | b | England |
Outcome
| Staff ID | Department ID | Location |
| 1 | a | Scotland |
| null | b | England |
| 2 | c | Wales |
So because department B is in england it picks that up rather than where the staff id is based, I wouldnt want to use department ID as certain staff would not be located in the department location so would prefer to pick it up from Staff ID, but where thats missing from department ID instead
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Porkey ,
Please try to use Right Outer join kind.
Then remove the columns that you don't need.
Best Regards
Community Support Team _ Polly
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @Porkey ,
Please try to use Right Outer join kind.
Then remove the columns that you don't need.
Best Regards
Community Support Team _ Polly
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 78 | |
| 46 | |
| 37 | |
| 31 | |
| 26 |