Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreGet certified in Microsoft Fabric—for free! For a limited time, get a free DP-600 exam voucher to use by the end of 2024. Register now
I have one column which is in table A.
id1
QRC
SRC
MRC
I have one column which is in table B.
id2
QRF
SRF
MRF
OUTPUT:-
COLUMN HEADER:-
ID |QRC| QRF| SRC| SRF| MRC| MRF
EDIT: This is just an example, In real scenario, each column contains more than 40+ values.
I want this output scenario to happen automatically in column, not dynamically using transpose function.
Solved! Go to Solution.
not sure if this is what you want
in PQ, appendix two tables
transpose tables
user first row as header
pls see the attachment below
Proud to be a Super User!
what about merge two columns to get a new column and put that column to the matrix?
Proud to be a Super User!
not sure if this is what you want
in PQ, appendix two tables
transpose tables
user first row as header
pls see the attachment below
Proud to be a Super User!
Yes, this is what I want, but I see you have converted it to columns using transpose and have selected each and every column to keep it in place,
But the question was an example, In future case I can have more than 40+ values in each column so instead of dynamically selecting that column, I want that it should happen automatically, all the column values should be shown as output columns without transposing it into various columns and selecting it.
what about we just appendix data and put the new column in a matrix?
pls see the attachment below
Proud to be a Super User!
Thanks for the help,
I saw that column names are different, and I cannot change column names due to permission issues. and I edited the post accordingly.
so you want the output to change from id1 and id 2 to ID?
Proud to be a Super User!
Column name doesn't matter, column values matter in this situation.
not quite understand this request. you said column names are different in the previous post. what's the problem you are facing after you used the solution i provided?
Proud to be a Super User!
Column names are different , so it is being generated as 2 columns as shown in screenshot below
what about merge two columns to get a new column and put that column to the matrix?
Proud to be a Super User!
Yes, It got solved thanks
you are welcome
Proud to be a Super User!
Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Fabric product team to learn just how easy it is to get started.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early Bird pricing ends December 9th.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
76 | |
74 | |
55 | |
45 |
User | Count |
---|---|
117 | |
106 | |
77 | |
66 | |
65 |