Power BI is turning 10! Tune in for a special live episode on July 24 with behind-the-scenes stories, product evolution highlights, and a sneak peek at what’s in store for the future.
Save the dateEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends August 31st. Request your voucher.
Hello
As a relative newbie to DAX, I often find myself going round and round getting tantalisingly close to a solution but missing the knowledge to make things work. To date, head banging has eventually got me a solution, but not today.
I have a table of Issuers, the relevant fields being IssuerID, Ticker and Analyst. The same Ticker can be used across multiple IssuerIDs.
I have a table of Assets, with relevant fields of AssetID, IssuerID, Region, Country and NominalAmountUSD. The join is from IssuerLookup (1) to AssetLookup (Many), on the IssuerID.
My task is to show reports by Ticker, Analyst, Region and Country. An Issuer can have several Assets and hence multiple region/country combinations, but I'm being asked to extract just one to report on. The business rule is to use the combination that has the highest NominalAmountUSD - that value comes from a Fact table joined to the Asset table.
I've learnt how to create a calculated table, and that's a good first step. The following query lets me group across IssuerIDs that share a Ticker:
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
IssuerLookup[IssuerTicker],
IssuerLookup[Analyst2],
AssetLookup[Region Of Risk],
AssetLookup[Country Of Risk],
"Sum_NV_USD", CALCULATE(SUM(Fact_Assets[NominalAmountUSD]))
)
That gives me good groupings, so the next step is to extract the Analyst, Region and Country for a given ticker where Sum_NV_USD is the maximum. Having made a virtual table from the query above, called IssuerTickerToCountryOfRisk, the following query finds me the maximum SuNV_USD for a given Ticker:
GROUPBY(
IssuerTickerToCountryOfRisk,
IssuerTickerToCountryOfRisk[IssuerTicker],
"MaxSum", MAXX(CURRENTGROUP(), IssuerTickerToCountryOfRisk[Sum_NV_USD])
)
But I cannot figure out how to combine these to generate a final calculated table that just has the one row per ticker, with the Region and Country coming from the combination with the highest NominalAmountUSD. I'd like to use CALCULATEDTABLE but the filter argument for that can't use aggregates. I've experimented with various combinations of ADDCOLUMNS and SUMMARIZE, but without success.
I'd like to have a calculated table in the model with these results so as to refer to it from more than one Power BI Visual. Any guidance on achieving this will be much appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @CaptainCrewe,
You can try to use below formula to get the filter result table.
Filtted Table = CALCULATETABLE(Table1,FILTER(ALL(Table1),CONTAINS(Tablel2,Tablel2[IssuerTicker],Table1[IssuerTicker],Tablel2[Max_Sum_NV_USD],Table1[Sum_NV_USD])))
Notice: 'table1'(summarizecolumns), 'table2'(group by).
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
Thank you for your response.
I'm not sure in what form you need the sample data. For now, I'll show a couple of extracts from my DAX Studio queries. The first shows the initial grouping by Ticker, Analyst, Region and Country with a Sum of the NominalAmount to be used as a tie-breaker, obtained from the SUMMARIZECOLUMNS function:
IssuerTicker | Analyst2 | Region Of Risk | Country Of Risk | Sum_NV_USD |
AAA | Jim Smith | Africa | Morocco | 600000 |
BBB | Amy Bloggs | North America | Canada | 1656090590 |
CCC | Mary Doe | South America | Chile | 894679350 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Asia | China | 22909716756 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Asia | Hong Kong | 18898282952 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Asia | Macao | 1762612500 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Asia | Singapore | 562370067 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Australia | Australia | 8865500 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Europe | France | 1185432644 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Europe | Luxembourg | 11250000 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Europe | United Kingdom | 552160000 |
EEE | Mary Doe | South America | Chile | 1293134082 |
FFF | David Jones | North America | Canada | 3179842513 |
I turned this into a calculated table in my model (IssuerTickerToCountryOfRisk) so as to query it more easily and find the MAX(SUM_NV_USD).
Using the GROUPBY function, I can find the maximum Sum_NV_USD for a given ticker:
IssuerTicker | Max_Sum_NV_USD |
AAA | 600000 |
BBB | 1656090590 |
CCC | 894679350 |
DDD | 22909716756 |
EEE | 1293134082 |
FFF | 3179842513 |
What I'm aiming for is a calculated table with only one row per ticker. Where a ticker has more than one combination of Region and Country (ie DDD in this extract), then I need to select the row with the highest Sum_NV_USD. Easy to do in SQL and I fear I may be bringing too much of that mindset to this problem. I feel there must be a more elegant way to return the desired rows.
IssuerTicker | Analyst2 | Region Of Risk | Country Of Risk | Sum_NV_USD |
AAA | Jim Smith | Africa | Morocco | 600000 |
BBB | Amy Bloggs | North America | Canada | 1656090590 |
CCC | Mary Doe | South America | Chile | 894679350 |
DDD | Joe Brown | Asia | China | 22909716756 |
EEE | Mary Doe | South America | Chile | 1293134082 |
FFF | David Jones | North America | Canada | 3179842513 |
The final objective is to use this summarized table of ticker, analyst, region and country as a replacement lookup table for reports where a single analyst, region and/or country is wanted for a given ticker. The Sum_NV_USD isn't needed since it can come from a measure calculation over the underlying fact table.
Thanks again for taking an interest
Hi @CaptainCrewe,
You can try to use below formula to get the filter result table.
Filtted Table = CALCULATETABLE(Table1,FILTER(ALL(Table1),CONTAINS(Tablel2,Tablel2[IssuerTicker],Table1[IssuerTicker],Tablel2[Max_Sum_NV_USD],Table1[Sum_NV_USD])))
Notice: 'table1'(summarizecolumns), 'table2'(group by).
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
That's wonderful. Works a treat. In my wanderings to date, I hadn't noticed or thought to try CONTAINS.
This will certainly get me going and I thank you for your good understanding of my problem. As a matter of interest and to increase my DAX knowledge, are you able to confirm how my source queries and your solution might be combined? It would be much neater to have one statement and one table rather than three.
I think the approach would be to use table variables, but I'm confused by the scope of these. I tried the following and get the error "The column 'IssuerTicker' specified in the GROUPBY function was not found in the input table":
TestTable = VAR Table1 = SUMMARIZECOLUMNS( IssuerLookup[IssuerTicker], IssuerLookup[Analyst2], AssetLookup[Region Of Risk], AssetLookup[Country Of Risk], "Sum_NV_USD", CALCULATE(SUM(Fact_Assets[NominalAmountUSD])) ) VAR Table2 = GROUPBY( Table1, Table1[IssuerTicker], "MaxSum", MAXX(CURRENTGROUP(), Table1[Sum_NV_USD]) ) RETURN CALCULATETABLE( Table1, FILTER( ALL(Table1), CONTAINS(Table2, Table2[IssuerTicker], Table1[IssuerTicker], Table2[MaxSum], Table1[Sum_NV_USD]) ) )
Looking around, including your post of 08-29-2016, I suspect Table2 above can't accept Table1 as part of its definition. Do you think there is a way to combine all these into one calculated table definition?
This is all a 'nice to have'. I'm very grateful for your good assistance in solving the main problem.
HI @CaptainCrewe,
I modified your formula without test on real table, perhaps you can try it if it works on your side.
TestTable = VAR Table1 = SUMMARIZECOLUMNS( IssuerLookup[IssuerTicker], IssuerLookup[Analyst2], AssetLookup[Region Of Risk], AssetLookup[Country Of Risk], "Sum_NV_USD", CALCULATE(SUM(Fact_Assets[NominalAmountUSD])) ) VAR Table2 = SUMMARIZE( Table1, [IssuerTicker], "MaxSum", MAXX(FILTER(Table1,[IssuerTicker]=EARLISER([IssuerTicker])), [Sum_NV_USD]) ) RETURN FILTER( Table1, CONTAINS(Table2, [IssuerTicker], [IssuerTicker], [MaxSum], [Sum_NV_USD]) )
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
Hi,
I am having a similar problem but can't figure out how to modify my headusre to make SUMMARIZE work.
I have a measure that isn't adding up the total correctly so i wanted to use SUMMARIZE to get around that issue but i am getting the error: "The column 'IRI/Spins Cust' specified in the 'SUMMARIZE' function was not found in the input table."
Measure that doesn't add up correctly at total:
It does indeed work. I'll have to study the differences between my attempt and your solution. On the face of it, looks like GROUPBY isn't useful in this context - though your translation of its objective via a SUMMARIZE is very useful.
I also note how you reference the columns in the table variable. All extremely helpful.
Many thanks for helping me over this hurdle and for impressing me afresh with the power of DAX.
User | Count |
---|---|
76 | |
75 | |
46 | |
31 | |
27 |
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
91 | |
51 | |
49 | |
45 |