Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Prepping for a Fabric certification exam? Join us for a live prep session with exam experts to learn how to pass the exam. Register now.

Reply
Zyg_D
Continued Contributor
Continued Contributor

Formula with variables works, while without - doesn't. Why?

Can someone please guide me why does my formula work in the form containing variables, but when I move their contents back into the formula, it doesn't?

The form containing variables:

 

Result = 
var _parent = [Parent]
var _maxvalue = 
CALCULATE(
    MAX(Table1[Value]),
    ALLEXCEPT(Table2,Table2[Parent])
)
return
CONCATENATEX(
    CALCULATETABLE(
        FILTER(
            ALL(Table1),
            Table1[Value] = _maxvalue &&
            RELATED(Table2[Parent]) = _parent
        )
    ),
    [Name],","
)

 

The form without variables:

 

Result2 = 
CONCATENATEX(
    CALCULATETABLE(
        FILTER(
            ALL(Table1),
            Table1[Value] = CALCULATE(
                                MAX(Table1[Value]),
                                ALLEXCEPT(Table2,Table2[Parent])
                            )
            && RELATED(Table2[Parent]) = [Parent]
        )
    ),
    [Name],","
)

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
d_gosbell
Super User
Super User

In the first example with the variables the value of the variables is evaluated once and captured, then the rest of the expression is evaluated.

 

In the second expression without the variables both the [Parent] measure and the MAX() expression are re-evaluated for each row of Table1 (since they are referenced inside the FILTER function which effectively iterates row by row over Table1). This may or may not  affect the [Parent] measure depending on your data and how the two tables are related, but it will definitely have a big impact on the calculation of MAX( Table1[Value] ).

 

Effectively as the FILTER function iterates row by row over Table1 it calculates the MAX of Table1[Value] for that row which gives you the current value for that row. This in turn will return every row in Table1 as you are effectively checking if the amount in the [Value] column is equal to itself. You could probably fix this by adding an ALL(table1) as a parameter in your calculation of the MAX(), but personally I find using variables simpler (and they perform better also).

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
d_gosbell
Super User
Super User

In the first example with the variables the value of the variables is evaluated once and captured, then the rest of the expression is evaluated.

 

In the second expression without the variables both the [Parent] measure and the MAX() expression are re-evaluated for each row of Table1 (since they are referenced inside the FILTER function which effectively iterates row by row over Table1). This may or may not  affect the [Parent] measure depending on your data and how the two tables are related, but it will definitely have a big impact on the calculation of MAX( Table1[Value] ).

 

Effectively as the FILTER function iterates row by row over Table1 it calculates the MAX of Table1[Value] for that row which gives you the current value for that row. This in turn will return every row in Table1 as you are effectively checking if the amount in the [Value] column is equal to itself. You could probably fix this by adding an ALL(table1) as a parameter in your calculation of the MAX(), but personally I find using variables simpler (and they perform better also).

Helpful resources

Announcements
May PBI 25 Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - May 2025

Check out the May 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

Notebook Gallery Carousel1

NEW! Community Notebooks Gallery

Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.

May 2025 Monthly Update

Fabric Community Update - May 2025

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric community.