Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Learn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
Hi,
I'm working on a table that needs to show every name on a list and corresponding data, even when being filtered. For example:
| Name | Data |
| Name 1 | 1 |
| Name 2 | 2 |
| Name 3 | 3 |
That is how it shows when all names are selected, and is supposed to show always. However, what is currently happening when a name is selected is this:
| Name | Data |
| Name 1 | |
| Name 2 | 2 |
| Name 3 |
Simplifying the parameter as a count, this is basically what I've done for the data column:
CALCULATE(COUNT('Table'[Data]),
FILTER(ALL('Table'),'Table'[Name]=SELECTEDVALUE('Table'[Name])))
| Name | Data |
| Name 1 | 6 |
| Name 2 | 6 |
| Name 3 | 6 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
@Ashish_Mathur wrote:Hi,
Simplify your measure to
=COUNT('Table'[Data])
@SamInogic wrote:Hi,
As per understanding to are attempted to achieve is to always display all names in the visual, while the Data column still shows the correct value for each row, even when a slicer filters one name.
The issue occurs because SELECTEDVALUE('Table'[Name]) is affected by the slicer context, which removes other names from the filter context. As a result, only the selected name returns data while the others appear blank.
Recommended Approach
Instead of using SELECTEDVALUE, remove the slicer filter on Name while keeping the row context from the visual.
You can modify the measure like this:
Data Measure =
CALCULATE(
COUNT('Table'[Data]),
REMOVEFILTERS('Table'[Name])
)
This Works Because
REMOVEFILTERS('Table'[Name]) removes the slicer filter on the Name column.
• The row context from the table visual still applies, so each row calculates its own value.
• This allows the visual to display all names with their corresponding data, even when a slicer selection exists.
Hope this helps.
Thanks!
No, these are the opposite of what I wanted to do, and the second one smells like AI.
I already mentioned what ended up working a few comments ago, but this is the DAX:
CALCULATE(COUNT('Table'[Data]),
FILTER(ALL('Helper Table'),'Helper Table'[Name]=SELECTEDVALUE('Table'[Name])))
The Helper Table is connected to the original table by Name and Helper Table[Name] was in the slicer.
1) Create a disconnected Name table
Name Slicer =
DISTINCT ( DimName[Name] )
Do not create a relationship from Name Slicer to your model.
2) Use fields like this
Table visual rows: DimName[Name] (the “real” name dimension that drives the rows)
Slicer: Name Slicer[Name]
3) Measure (filters data using the slicer, but keeps all rows)
Data Count :=
VAR SelNames = VALUES ( 'Name Slicer'[Name] )
RETURN
IF (
ISFILTERED ( 'Name Slicer'[Name] ),
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( Fact[Data] ),
TREATAS ( SelNames, DimName[Name] )
),
COUNT ( Fact[Data] )
)
@Ashish_Mathur wrote:Hi,
Simplify your measure to
=COUNT('Table'[Data])
@SamInogic wrote:Hi,
As per understanding to are attempted to achieve is to always display all names in the visual, while the Data column still shows the correct value for each row, even when a slicer filters one name.
The issue occurs because SELECTEDVALUE('Table'[Name]) is affected by the slicer context, which removes other names from the filter context. As a result, only the selected name returns data while the others appear blank.
Recommended Approach
Instead of using SELECTEDVALUE, remove the slicer filter on Name while keeping the row context from the visual.
You can modify the measure like this:
Data Measure =
CALCULATE(
COUNT('Table'[Data]),
REMOVEFILTERS('Table'[Name])
)
This Works Because
REMOVEFILTERS('Table'[Name]) removes the slicer filter on the Name column.
• The row context from the table visual still applies, so each row calculates its own value.
• This allows the visual to display all names with their corresponding data, even when a slicer selection exists.
Hope this helps.
Thanks!
No, these are the opposite of what I wanted to do, and the second one smells like AI.
I already mentioned what ended up working a few comments ago, but this is the DAX:
CALCULATE(COUNT('Table'[Data]),
FILTER(ALL('Helper Table'),'Helper Table'[Name]=SELECTEDVALUE('Table'[Name])))
The Helper Table is connected to the original table by Name and Helper Table[Name] was in the slicer.
Use This:
Data Count =
CALCULATE(
COUNT('Table'[Data]),
'Table'[Name] = MAX('Table'[Name])
)
If this answer helped, please click 👍 or Accept as Solution.
-Kedar
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kedar-pande
Hi,
As per understanding to are attempted to achieve is to always display all names in the visual, while the Data column still shows the correct value for each row, even when a slicer filters one name.
The issue occurs because SELECTEDVALUE('Table'[Name]) is affected by the slicer context, which removes other names from the filter context. As a result, only the selected name returns data while the others appear blank.
Recommended Approach
Instead of using SELECTEDVALUE, remove the slicer filter on Name while keeping the row context from the visual.
You can modify the measure like this:
Data Measure =
CALCULATE(
COUNT('Table'[Data]),
REMOVEFILTERS('Table'[Name])
)
This Works Because
REMOVEFILTERS('Table'[Name]) removes the slicer filter on the Name column.
• The row context from the table visual still applies, so each row calculates its own value.
• This allows the visual to display all names with their corresponding data, even when a slicer selection exists.
Hope this helps.
Thanks!
Hi @jmsny
Your measure doesn't work because it applies the same value for the whole of the table of the selected name. You can either remove the interaction or use a disconnected table.
Please see the attached pbix.
If this still doesn't work, please further elabarote your use case.
Hi,
Simplify your measure to
=COUNT('Table'[Data])
Update: the helper table I was using was the cause and solution of the problem. I don't fully understand it since I tried both the original and helper tables as slicers, but the filter needs to be on the helper table and the selected value needs to be the original table. It doesn't work the other way around even if the slicer is from the original table.
Please try out this:
That does not work. It's similar to what I mentioned at the end:
If I filter on a different variable instead of SELECTEDVALUE for Name, it populates the entire table, but without row-specific values
I don't want it to show the same value for every name, I want it to show individual values.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 50 | |
| 49 | |
| 35 | |
| 15 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 92 | |
| 75 | |
| 41 | |
| 26 | |
| 25 |