Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowData Days is here! Join us now for 60+ days of learning, challenges, and connection. Learn more
I have one large table, Table 1, that I want to apply some cleaning and transformations to. After that, I want to duplicate it and create some "child" tables from it, eg Table 2. "Duplicate table" does that, no problem. However, I want any new changes I make after this on Table 1 to also flow to Table 2. I would also prefer to not have duplicated the original get data query of Table 1, having duplicated it to create Table 2.
Is this possible?
Example:
Table 1 -> some transformations -> duplicate to create Table 2 -> Table 1 add a column -> Table 2 also gets column added automatically, and data refreshed and synced from Table 1, when Table 1 is refreshed.
Solved! Go to Solution.
@Anonymous , Create a reference
That will use table one always with steps
Sometimes I do this
I bring Table1. Do not do any action on that Create table 2 and table 3 as reference and do all actions of those
Answered my own secondary question. In case anyone else is wondering:
Table 1 has the original query and transformation steps needed (even Table 2 etc need these). Then I do Reference to create a Table 2. All Transformations from Table 1 are applied to Table 2. After that, if I make a change to Table 1 such as Add Column, this new column also appears in Table 2. Exactly what I need. If I need to maintain or clean new data in Table 1, that work is copied over to the Refernce Table 2.
@Anonymous , Create a reference
That will use table one always with steps
Sometimes I do this
I bring Table1. Do not do any action on that Create table 2 and table 3 as reference and do all actions of those
If I am understanding correctly it sounds like Reference will only run the query once, but I will need to manually duplicate the transformations in each of the new reference tables.
Duplicate will copy the transformations, but will also duplicate the queries for each table.
So I have to choose which is the lesser evil for my use- redundant queries or redundant transformations. Is that right?
Don't miss out on Data Days, June 15 through August 7. Learn Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more.
Check out the May 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 23 | |
| 23 | |
| 21 | |
| 17 | |
| 13 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 58 | |
| 51 | |
| 39 | |
| 29 | |
| 24 |