Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Vote for your favorite vizzies from the Power BI Dataviz World Championship submissions. Vote now!
I'm wanting to create a chart (I'm calling it a 3x3 subplot, but this may not be the correct name) in Deneb: for each categorical x and y value, I want a stacked bar chart of the project names. [Eventually, colors will be added from a z value, highlighting based on group or tier, etc.] I'm using this sample data
and the code below. Currently, the bars are layered rather than stacked. I think I need to incorporate this transformation (measure cnt = COUNT('Table'[name]))
"transform": [
{
"stack": "cnt",
"as": ["ymin", "ymax"],
"groupby": ["x", "y"]
}
]but I'm not sure how/where to insert it into the code below.
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"layer": [
{
"mark": {
"type": "bar",
"stroke": "black",
"strokeWidth": 1,
"tooltip": true
}
},
{
"mark": "text",
"encoding": {
"text": {
"field": "Name",
"type": "nominal"
}
}
}
],
"encoding": {
"x": {
"field": "x",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["low", "med", "high"]
},
"axis": {
"title": "X Level",
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"y": {
"field": "y",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["high", "med", "low"]
},
"axis": {"title": "Y Level"}
}
}
}To be clear, I'm aiming for this sort of chart where names have been removed.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @patBear,
This should be achievable with a stack transform at the top-level, as you have guessed. To make the stack work better, I've added a window / row_number transform beforehand to group and sort each square by z:
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
]
This has the effect of assigning a sequence to each row as follows:
| Name | group_row_number |
| AA | 2 |
| BB | 1 |
| CC | 1 |
| DD | 1 |
| EE | 2 |
| FF | 1 |
| GG | 2 |
| HH | 1 |
We then use the same group approach in the stack, and use the group_row_number as the field to stack on.
Once this is done, I just need to use a yOffset in the encoding with the generated y1 field:
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
One thing I've done is reverse the scale so that marks are drawn from the bottom of each square.
The resulting visual looks as follows:
For completeness, here's the full spec:
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
],
"layer": [
{
"mark": {
"type": "bar",
"stroke": "black",
"strokeWidth": 1,
"tooltip": true
}
},
{
"mark": "text",
"encoding": {
"text": {
"field": "Name",
"type": "nominal"
}
}
}
],
"encoding": {
"x": {
"field": "x",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["low", "med", "high"]
},
"axis": {
"title": "X Level",
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"y": {
"field": "y",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["high", "med", "low"]
},
"axis": {"title": "Y Level"}
},
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
}
}
Hopefully this is what you're expecting, but should be possible to tweak to your liking if not.
Good luck (and thanks for considering Deneb)!
Daniel
Proud to be a Super User!
On how to ask a technical question, if you really want an answer (courtesy of SQLBI)
Hi @patBear,
This should be achievable with a stack transform at the top-level, as you have guessed. To make the stack work better, I've added a window / row_number transform beforehand to group and sort each square by z:
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
]
This has the effect of assigning a sequence to each row as follows:
| Name | group_row_number |
| AA | 2 |
| BB | 1 |
| CC | 1 |
| DD | 1 |
| EE | 2 |
| FF | 1 |
| GG | 2 |
| HH | 1 |
We then use the same group approach in the stack, and use the group_row_number as the field to stack on.
Once this is done, I just need to use a yOffset in the encoding with the generated y1 field:
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
One thing I've done is reverse the scale so that marks are drawn from the bottom of each square.
The resulting visual looks as follows:
For completeness, here's the full spec:
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
],
"layer": [
{
"mark": {
"type": "bar",
"stroke": "black",
"strokeWidth": 1,
"tooltip": true
}
},
{
"mark": "text",
"encoding": {
"text": {
"field": "Name",
"type": "nominal"
}
}
}
],
"encoding": {
"x": {
"field": "x",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["low", "med", "high"]
},
"axis": {
"title": "X Level",
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"y": {
"field": "y",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["high", "med", "low"]
},
"axis": {"title": "Y Level"}
},
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
}
}
Hopefully this is what you're expecting, but should be possible to tweak to your liking if not.
Good luck (and thanks for considering Deneb)!
Daniel
Proud to be a Super User!
On how to ask a technical question, if you really want an answer (courtesy of SQLBI)
Thanks for this. It's exactly the structure I was needing to move forward!
Vote for your favorite vizzies from the Power BI World Championship submissions!
If you love stickers, then you will definitely want to check out our Community Sticker Challenge!
Check out the January 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 56 | |
| 53 | |
| 40 | |
| 17 | |
| 16 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 117 | |
| 107 | |
| 42 | |
| 32 | |
| 26 |