Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreWe've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now
I'm wanting to create a chart (I'm calling it a 3x3 subplot, but this may not be the correct name) in Deneb: for each categorical x and y value, I want a stacked bar chart of the project names. [Eventually, colors will be added from a z value, highlighting based on group or tier, etc.] I'm using this sample data
and the code below. Currently, the bars are layered rather than stacked. I think I need to incorporate this transformation (measure cnt = COUNT('Table'[name]))
"transform": [
{
"stack": "cnt",
"as": ["ymin", "ymax"],
"groupby": ["x", "y"]
}
]but I'm not sure how/where to insert it into the code below.
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"layer": [
{
"mark": {
"type": "bar",
"stroke": "black",
"strokeWidth": 1,
"tooltip": true
}
},
{
"mark": "text",
"encoding": {
"text": {
"field": "Name",
"type": "nominal"
}
}
}
],
"encoding": {
"x": {
"field": "x",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["low", "med", "high"]
},
"axis": {
"title": "X Level",
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"y": {
"field": "y",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["high", "med", "low"]
},
"axis": {"title": "Y Level"}
}
}
}To be clear, I'm aiming for this sort of chart where names have been removed.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @patBear,
This should be achievable with a stack transform at the top-level, as you have guessed. To make the stack work better, I've added a window / row_number transform beforehand to group and sort each square by z:
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
]
This has the effect of assigning a sequence to each row as follows:
| Name | group_row_number |
| AA | 2 |
| BB | 1 |
| CC | 1 |
| DD | 1 |
| EE | 2 |
| FF | 1 |
| GG | 2 |
| HH | 1 |
We then use the same group approach in the stack, and use the group_row_number as the field to stack on.
Once this is done, I just need to use a yOffset in the encoding with the generated y1 field:
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
One thing I've done is reverse the scale so that marks are drawn from the bottom of each square.
The resulting visual looks as follows:
For completeness, here's the full spec:
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
],
"layer": [
{
"mark": {
"type": "bar",
"stroke": "black",
"strokeWidth": 1,
"tooltip": true
}
},
{
"mark": "text",
"encoding": {
"text": {
"field": "Name",
"type": "nominal"
}
}
}
],
"encoding": {
"x": {
"field": "x",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["low", "med", "high"]
},
"axis": {
"title": "X Level",
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"y": {
"field": "y",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["high", "med", "low"]
},
"axis": {"title": "Y Level"}
},
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
}
}
Hopefully this is what you're expecting, but should be possible to tweak to your liking if not.
Good luck (and thanks for considering Deneb)!
Daniel
Proud to be a Super User!
On how to ask a technical question, if you really want an answer (courtesy of SQLBI)
Hi @patBear,
This should be achievable with a stack transform at the top-level, as you have guessed. To make the stack work better, I've added a window / row_number transform beforehand to group and sort each square by z:
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
]
This has the effect of assigning a sequence to each row as follows:
| Name | group_row_number |
| AA | 2 |
| BB | 1 |
| CC | 1 |
| DD | 1 |
| EE | 2 |
| FF | 1 |
| GG | 2 |
| HH | 1 |
We then use the same group approach in the stack, and use the group_row_number as the field to stack on.
Once this is done, I just need to use a yOffset in the encoding with the generated y1 field:
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
One thing I've done is reverse the scale so that marks are drawn from the bottom of each square.
The resulting visual looks as follows:
For completeness, here's the full spec:
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"transform": [
{
"window": [
{
"op": "row_number",
"as": "group_row_number"
}
],
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}]
},
{
"stack": "group_row_number",
"groupby": ["x", "y"],
"sort": [{"field": "z"}],
"as": ["y1", "y2"]
}
],
"layer": [
{
"mark": {
"type": "bar",
"stroke": "black",
"strokeWidth": 1,
"tooltip": true
}
},
{
"mark": "text",
"encoding": {
"text": {
"field": "Name",
"type": "nominal"
}
}
}
],
"encoding": {
"x": {
"field": "x",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["low", "med", "high"]
},
"axis": {
"title": "X Level",
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"y": {
"field": "y",
"type": "nominal",
"scale": {
"domain": ["high", "med", "low"]
},
"axis": {"title": "Y Level"}
},
"yOffset": {
"field": "y1",
"scale": {"reverse": true}
}
}
}
Hopefully this is what you're expecting, but should be possible to tweak to your liking if not.
Good luck (and thanks for considering Deneb)!
Daniel
Proud to be a Super User!
On how to ask a technical question, if you really want an answer (courtesy of SQLBI)
Thanks for this. It's exactly the structure I was needing to move forward!
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 57 | |
| 40 | |
| 36 | |
| 19 | |
| 18 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 70 | |
| 69 | |
| 38 | |
| 35 | |
| 23 |