Forum Discussion
Date Relationship
I think since you are creating relationship of disdate and date table using date column that's why you are limiting the capabilities of date data. Therefore if you need to have all the capabilities for date values (hierarchy) then you should create a DateKey (Integer Value) on both tables and then join it on that. After that you will see all the hierarchy for your date values.
Thanks FarhanAhmed1984, that does work for the calc but it also works if I just remove the '.[date]' from 'disdate'.
The problem I'm having seems to be more with the disdate column, without a relationship it works as a date column including date hierarchy.
But when I use it in a relationship with a calendar table I have created I can no longer use it as a date hierarchy and it no longer works in the calc it previously worked in.
Thanks,
Conor.
If your calculation uses Date from Date table then it wont work because it is many to one relationship between these two fields. there can be multiple discharge dates for same dates.
Otherwise relationship created from YourTable to DateTable won't have any affect on calcualtion.
What exactly you are getting when you are creating relationship from Date table ?
When I create the relationship I get the error in my initial post but if I delete the relationship, the calc works perfectly as it is in the initial post.
The calc isn't using any of the fields from the DateTable just columns from the FactsTable.
So I don't understand what the relationship is doing to stop "'Hipe Data'[DisDate].[Date]" from working when it worked before the relationship?
Appreciate your patience!
Conor.I think since you are creating relationship of disdate and date table using date column that's why you are limiting the capabilities of date data. Therefore if you need to have all the capabilities for date values (hierarchy) then you should create a DateKey (Integer Value) on both tables and then join it on that. After that you will see all the hierarchy for your date values.
Thanks FarhanAhmed1984 think I kind of understand it now.