Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Sign up nowGet Fabric certified for FREE! Don't miss your chance! Learn more
Hi,
I have a data model that in a simplified way has 5 tables:
>>> TAB1: the granularity of this table is the ID_OPE and there is a metric associated with this table (fact)
>>> TAB2: the granularity of this table is the ID_SUB and there is a metric associated with this table (fact). The same ID_OPE can be associated with more than one ID_SUB.
>>> TAB3: the granularity of this table is the ID_LIB and there is a metric associated with this table (fact). The same ID_SUB can be associated with more than one ID_LIB
>>> TAB4: the granularity of this table is the ID_OPE_EVENT. The same ID_OPE can have several ID_OPE_EVENT
>>> TAB5: the granularity of this table is the ID_SUB_EVENT. The same ID_SUB can have several ID_SUB_EVENT
I want to be able to relate information from all tables in the same view and filter bidirectionally as needed. However, I can only make the model as a whole work if I put a many-to-many relationship, as shown below:
Doing the above model looks like everything is working. However, I would like to know what the best practice would be (I don't think it's possible to use a star model and I can’t use a single association table, with all ids, as it results in tens of millions of rows in my model, impacting performance ).
I'd like to know if there are any issues I should be concerned about this model above, and if so, which other model should I use.
Hi @maxbbbfff ,
You may consider to remove table1 and create many to many relationship between table2 and table4.
Best Regards,
Jay
Hello, Thanks for the feedback. I need the existing information in the 5 tables. I summarized the tables by just putting the IDs, but they all have important data. In particular, tables 1, 2 and 3 are fact tables.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 67 | |
| 58 | |
| 44 | |
| 19 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 105 | |
| 105 | |
| 36 | |
| 26 | |
| 26 |