Don't miss your chance to take exam DP-600 or DP-700 on us!
Request nowLearn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
Hi I have a PowerBI report page that want some optimization.
Below query tabkes about 600ms. According to Marco Russo ideal time for a query is between 20-60ms.
In the below query it generates 23 storage engine queris. Formula Engine taks 418ms(75%) and Storage Engine Takes 146ms(25%).
There are few measures in the query which I belive effect the performance. The measures are as below. I have only put include the definition of one measure.
Re_Registraion_Overdue = MEASURE 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Overdue] = IF (
ISBLANK (
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
),
0,
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
Rest of the mesures in the query are inside the evaluate part of the script and starts with Re_Registration_Due****
Here is the copy of the query.
DEFINE
VAR __DS0FilterTable =
FILTER(
KEEPFILTERS(VALUES('AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Status Code])),
NOT(
OR(
'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Status Code] = "HOU",
'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Status Code] = "WD"
)
)
)
VAR __DS0FilterTable2 =
TREATAS({"Yes"}, 'AHS Community (Property)'[Managed])
EVALUATE
TOPN(
502,
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
ROLLUPADDISSUBTOTAL('AHS Community (Property)'[Community], "IsGrandTotalRowTotal"),
__DS0FilterTable,
__DS0FilterTable2,
"Re_Registraion_Overdue", 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Overdue],
"Re_Registraion_Due_8___14_Days", 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Due 8 - 14 Days],
"Re_Registraion_Due_15___28_Days", 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Due 15 - 28 Days],
"Re_Registraion_Due_0___7_Days", 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Due 0 - 7 Days],
"Re_Registraion_Due__365_Days", 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Due +365 Days],
"Re_Registraion_Due__29_Days", 'AHS RehousingList'[Re-Registraion Due +29 Days]
),
[IsGrandTotalRowTotal],
0,
'AHS Community (Property)'[Community],
1
)
ORDER BY
[IsGrandTotalRowTotal] DESC, 'AHS Community (Property)'[Community]
would anyone have how to optimise this query down to somewherebetween 20-50 ms
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hey,
without sample data, it is difficult to optimize the query performance, but at a first glance I would rewrite this:
[Re-Registraion Overdue] = IF (
ISBLANK (
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
),
0,
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
to this
Re_Registraion_Overdue =
var avariable =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
return
IF (
ISBLANK (avariable)
,0
,avariable
)
This should avoid a double evaluation of the CALCULATE() part.
Regards,
Tom
Hey,
without sample data, it is difficult to optimize the query performance, but at a first glance I would rewrite this:
[Re-Registraion Overdue] = IF (
ISBLANK (
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
),
0,
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
to this
Re_Registraion_Overdue =
var avariable =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'AHS RehousingList'[Rehousing List Ref] ),
'AHS RehousingList'[Days to Re-Register] <= 0
)
return
IF (
ISBLANK (avariable)
,0
,avariable
)
This should avoid a double evaluation of the CALCULATE() part.
Regards,
Tom
Thanks a lot Tom,
Yes using a variable resuces the time of the calculation as it only calculate ones and only if needed.
It helped too.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 51 | |
| 40 | |
| 37 | |
| 14 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 85 | |
| 69 | |
| 38 | |
| 29 | |
| 27 |