Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
My data set has two sheets. Sheet one has the columns project definition, engine spec, sub assembly and the actual costs. In this sheet each sub assembly has multiple actual costs. Sheet two has only the engine spec, sub assembly and standard cost. In sheet two each sub assembly only has one standard cost, compared to sheet one where each sub assembly has multiple. I want to compare the standard costs to the actual costs by project definition. This means the matrix visual would need to filter by which ever project definition the user chooses, link to the engine spec and bring back the relevant sub assemblies with their standard cost. it then needs to sum up the actual costs from sheet one by project definition and sub assembly.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi
Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Fabric Community Forum
Below are the few points that will resolve your issue let us know if you need any further assistance.
Please follow the below dax
Standard Cost = LOOKUPVALUE(
Standards[Standard Cost],
Standards[Sub Assembly], Actuals[Sub Assembly],
Standards[Engine Spec], Actuals[Engine Spec]
)
If it is solved, please mark the helpful reply or share your solution and accept it as solution, it will be helpful for other members of the community who have similar problems as yours to solve it faster.
Regards,
Chaithanya
Hi @Chxlsea_ ,
May I ask if you have gotten this issue resolved?
If it is solved, please mark the helpful reply or share your solution and accept it as solution, it will be helpful for other members of the community who have similar problems as yours to solve it faster.
Regards,
Chaithanya
Hi @Chxlsea_ ,
May I ask if you have gotten this issue resolved?
If it is solved, please mark the helpful reply or share your solution and accept it as solution, it will be helpful for other members of the community who have similar problems as yours to solve it faster.
Regards,
Chaithanya
Hi @Chxlsea_ ,
May I ask if you have gotten this issue resolved?
If it is solved, please mark the helpful reply or share your solution and accept it as solution, it will be helpful for other members of the community who have similar problems as yours to solve it faster.
Regards,
Chaithanya
Hi
Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Fabric Community Forum
Below are the few points that will resolve your issue let us know if you need any further assistance.
Please follow the below dax
Standard Cost = LOOKUPVALUE(
Standards[Standard Cost],
Standards[Sub Assembly], Actuals[Sub Assembly],
Standards[Engine Spec], Actuals[Engine Spec]
)
If it is solved, please mark the helpful reply or share your solution and accept it as solution, it will be helpful for other members of the community who have similar problems as yours to solve it faster.
Regards,
Chaithanya
Hi @Chxlsea_ ,
Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Fabric Community Forum.
can you try with below mentioned points to resolve your issue
Regards,
Chaithanya.
Hi, this works for the actual costs however for the standard each sub assembly still has the same cost but now its slightly lower
have you created the relationship between two tables?
or maybe you can try to create a dim table and connect dim table to these two tables. In the matrix, you need to use the sub assembly column from the dim table, the actual cost will show corresponding value.
if you still can't figure this out, pls provide some sample data of these two sheets.
Proud to be a Super User!
I have a DIM table for project definition, engine spec, sub assembly. the relationships are also set up for these.
then pls provide some sample data and expected output. you can paster the data table in the reply.
Proud to be a Super User!
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 40 | |
| 37 | |
| 35 | |
| 34 | |
| 27 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 136 | |
| 99 | |
| 73 | |
| 66 | |
| 65 |