Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more

Reply
Anonymous
Not applicable

Columns I exclude from Group by in power query disappear from my table

Hi,

I have a table that has multiple rows that match on a specific column. I went through a process to assign a parent_identifier as a custom column to all the rows so that I could create a parent table that relates one to many records. 

 

The process

  1. I did a group by party_name and selected all rows
  2. I added an index column
  3. I then expanded the rows

This achieved an identifier which is the same for each row where it matches on party_name - perfect!

 

The problem

All of my other columns have disappeared and I need them.

 

If I add those columns into the group by, then they don't disappear however, I don't want to group by them because the other columns are what make them unique and I only want to group by party_name.

 

How do I group by one column and not lose the other columns?

 

This code below is configured with my preferred grouping of name but also includes _party_category because it ensures it sticks around at the end of the process but also, doesn't impact the result. All the other columns would impact the result.

 

let
    Source = #"Vendor - TWL and WSL",
    #"Removed Other Columns" = Table.SelectColumns(Source,{"company_type_code", "supplier_code", "_party_role_category", "_party_role_type", "_party_category", "name"}),
    #"Capitalized Each Word" = Table.TransformColumns(#"Removed Other Columns",{{"name", Text.Proper, type text}}),
    #"Trimmed Text" = Table.TransformColumns(#"Capitalized Each Word",{{"name", Text.Trim, type text}}),
    #"Replaced Value" = Table.ReplaceValue(#"Trimmed Text","(","",Replacer.ReplaceText,{"name"}),
    #"Replaced Value1" = Table.ReplaceValue(#"Replaced Value",")","",Replacer.ReplaceText,{"name"}),
    #"Sorted Rows" = Table.Sort(#"Replaced Value1",{{"name", Order.Ascending}}),
    #"Grouped Rows" = Table.Group(#"Sorted Rows", {"_party_category", "name"}, {{"Count", each _, type table [company_type_code=nullable text, supplier_code=nullable text, _party_role_category=text, _party_role_type=text, _party_category=text, name=nullable text]}}),
    #"Added Index" = Table.AddIndexColumn(#"Grouped Rows", "Index", 5000, 1, Int64.Type),
    #"Expanded Count" = Table.ExpandTableColumn(#"Added Index", "Count", {"supplier_code", "_party_category", "name"}, {"Count.supplier_code", "Count._party_category", "Count.name"}),
    #"Renamed Columns" = Table.RenameColumns(#"Expanded Count",{{"Count.supplier_code", "child_identifier"}}),
    #"Reordered Columns" = Table.ReorderColumns(#"Renamed Columns",{"_party_category", "name", "Count._party_category", "Count.name", "Index", "child_identifier"}),
    #"Renamed Columns1" = Table.RenameColumns(#"Reordered Columns",{{"Index", "parent_identifier"}}),
    #"Removed Columns" = Table.RemoveColumns(#"Renamed Columns1",{"Count._party_category", "Count.name"}),
    #"Filtered Rows" = Table.SelectRows(#"Removed Columns", each ([child_identifier] = "B239" or [child_identifier] = "C393"))
in
    #"Filtered Rows"

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
HotChilli
Super User
Super User

A data sample would help.

On the Table.Group line I see that all the columns are included as an aggregation but on the ExpandTableColumn line only 3 are returned. Can you edit that step (using the interface) to return all columns.

I'm slightly confused that you say "All of my other columns have disappeared" . Is it returning the 3 columns as in th e code above? 

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
HotChilli
Super User
Super User

A data sample would help.

On the Table.Group line I see that all the columns are included as an aggregation but on the ExpandTableColumn line only 3 are returned. Can you edit that step (using the interface) to return all columns.

I'm slightly confused that you say "All of my other columns have disappeared" . Is it returning the 3 columns as in th e code above? 

Anonymous
Not applicable

ah! That was it! I have no idea why it decided to omit any columns at all, thank you for your help, that's worked!

Anonymous
Not applicable

Just to add to this, I added aggregation columns into my group by configuration for the ones I wanted but, they lose their uniqueness - In my example record, reason why I have two records is because the company_type_code is different for each row. When I aggregate using MIN it uses first value for both, MAX uses last value for both.

 

results.jpg

 

So I didn't have to create an aggreated column for child_identifier but that didn't disappear, that has a value per row, how do I get it to treat the other 3 columns the same as that one?

Helpful resources

Announcements
Power BI DataViz World Championships

Power BI Dataviz World Championships

The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!

December 2025 Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - December 2025

Check out the December 2025 Power BI Holiday Recap!

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.