Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-600) exam for FREE! Find out how by watching the DP-600 session on-demand now through April 28th.
Learn moreJoin the FabCon + SQLCon recap series. Up next: Power BI, Real-Time Intelligence, IQ and AI, and Data Factory take center stage. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Hello! 🙂
I am trying to "translate" a complex case statement in DAX. I have tried 'Switch function' and it's OK:
New field = SWITCH (
TRUE (),
table1[Category] = "hair-color", "LUXE",
table1[Category] = "hair-care", "LUXE",
table1[Category] = "hair-style", "LUXE",
...etc
"Other"
)
What's the problem? When within the case statement I have more options for the same string:
CASE
WHEN REGEXP_MATCH(Field 1, ".*Hair-Color.*|.*Hair-Care.*|.*Hair-Style.*") THEN "Hair"
WHEN REGEXP_MATCH(Field 1, ".*Skin-Sun.*|.*Skin-Face.*|.*Skin-Body.*") THEN "Skin"
... etc
ELSE "Other"
END
How can I translate every of these options: ".*Skin-Sun.*|.*Skin-Face.*|.*Skin-Body.*"|...etc" within my Switch function in DAX?
Thanks so much in advance! 🙂
Solved! Go to Solution.
@Anonymous , You can try like
New field = SWITCH (
TRUE (),
table1[Category] in ("hair-color","hair-care","hair-style"), "LUXE",
"Other"
)
But if need to search then you need use search, check
Hi @Anonymous ,
This might work?
_newField =
SWITCH(
TRUE(),
CONTAINSSTRING(table1[Category], "Hair"), "Hair",
CONTAINSSTRING(table1[Category], "Skin"), "Skin",
...
)
Pete
Proud to be a Datanaut!
@Anonymous , You can try like
New field = SWITCH (
TRUE (),
table1[Category] in ("hair-color","hair-care","hair-style"), "LUXE",
"Other"
)
But if need to search then you need use search, check
Hi Amit,
It is throwing an error of Operator or expressions '()' is not suported in this context.
Below ways can however work:
NEW_FIELD = SWITCH (
TRUE (),
CONTAINSSTRING(Table1[Category],"hair-color"), "LUXE",
CONTAINSSTRING(Table1[Category],"hair-care"),"LUXE",
CONTAINSSTRING(Table1[Category],"hair-style"), "LUXE"
)
and
NEW_FIELD = SWITCH (
TRUE (),
CONTAINSSTRING(Table1[Category],"hair-color")||CONTAINSSTRING(Table1[Category],"hair-care")||
CONTAINSSTRING(Table1[Category],"hair-style"), "LUXE"
)
But I would want to see , if we can give multiple values in "IN" Statement so to avoid giving column name, using CONTAINSSTRING function again and again , like it works in Tableau by using "|" symbol and dont need to give column name repeatedly WHEN REGEXP_MATCH(Field 1, "*.Hair-Color.*|*.Hair-Care.*|.*Hair-Style.*") THEN "Hair"
Hi @Anonymous ,
You can use Amit's answer, but you need to use curly braces (not standard paretheses) around the 'IN' list, as it is a list. Amit's calculation updated would look like this:
New field =
SWITCH (
TRUE (),
table1[Category] IN {"hair-color", "hair-care", "hair-style"}, "LUXE",
table1[Category] IN {"Skin-Sun", "Skin-Face", "Skin-Body"}, "SKIN",
"Other"
)
I already suggested the CONTAINSSTRING option but Amit's method, correctly implemented, is far more performant I believe.
Pete
Proud to be a Datanaut!
Check out the April 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 41 | |
| 37 | |
| 34 | |
| 21 | |
| 16 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 65 | |
| 62 | |
| 31 | |
| 26 | |
| 25 |