Forum Discussion
Bottom N not working as expected
Hi Team,
I have the following tables
City
Sales
In this example only 3 cities(city 1 through city 3) have sales.
I created a measure to calculate the bottom 2 cities based on sales as follows;
CALCULATE (
[Total Sales],
TOPN ( 2, ALL ( CityTable[City] ), [Total Sales], ASC ),
VALUES ( CityTable[City] )
)
I created a calculated table as follows
The measure I created finds cities 4 and 5 as the bottom 2 cities, I want to exclude these 2 cities and show City 3 & City 2 as the bottom 2 cities.
What changes should I do in the measure to get the correct results?
Please help
Hi, Jos13
Please try the below measure.
Bottom Cities =CALCULATE ([Total Sales],TOPN ( 2, FILTER(ALL ( CityTable[City] ), [Total Sales]>0), [Total Sales], ASC ),VALUES ( CityTable[City] ))Hi, My name is Jihwan Kim.
If this post helps, then please consider accept it as the solution to help other members find it faster, and give a big thumbs up.
Linkedin: linkedin.com/in/jihwankim1975/
Twitter: twitter.com/Jihwan_JHKIM
1 Reply
- Jihwan_KimSuper User
Hi, Jos13
Please try the below measure.
Bottom Cities =CALCULATE ([Total Sales],TOPN ( 2, FILTER(ALL ( CityTable[City] ), [Total Sales]>0), [Total Sales], ASC ),VALUES ( CityTable[City] ))Hi, My name is Jihwan Kim.
If this post helps, then please consider accept it as the solution to help other members find it faster, and give a big thumbs up.
Linkedin: linkedin.com/in/jihwankim1975/
Twitter: twitter.com/Jihwan_JHKIM