Skip to main content
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The ultimate Microsoft Fabric, Power BI, Azure AI & SQL learning event! Join us in Las Vegas from March 26-28, 2024. Use code MSCUST for a $100 discount. Register Now

Helper III
Helper III

Best way to setup data model with many to manys and normalized tables

All - I have a test data model design here where I have multiple normalized dimension tables but the measures don't seem to give me the right counts.   When you have many dimension tables like this that have many to many's,  is this the way to properly setup the data model, or is it better to try to design a different, denormalized design?









Sample PBIX 

Super User
Super User

Don't attempt to join fact tables. They should only be controlled by common dimensions. Don't have 1:1 relationships.  Don't have bidirectional relationships unless it is absolutely unavoidable.

@lbendlin I got rid of the fact to fact joins. The 1:1 i will merge together. But is there any better option than still having this long string of bidirectionals to span all the factless fact and dimension tables?

As long as it remotely resembles a star schema you should be good.  The data model needs to follow the business question, don't expect a single data model version to anwer all of yours.

Helpful resources

Fabric Community Conference

Microsoft Fabric Community Conference

Join us at our first-ever Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 26-28, 2024 in Las Vegas with 100+ sessions by community experts and Microsoft engineering.

February 2024 Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - February 2024

Check out the February 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

Fabric Career Hub

Microsoft Fabric Career Hub

Explore career paths and learn resources in Fabric.

Fabric Partner Community

Microsoft Fabric Partner Community

Engage with the Fabric engineering team, hear of product updates, business opportunities, and resources in the Fabric Partner Community.