Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

We've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now

Reply
pstanek
Post Patron
Post Patron

ALL function

hi Does function all remove  report level filter?

 Do I Have to use allexcept to preserve that filter in measure and calculated columns?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Anonymous
Not applicable

Yes. Any filtering-type functions will return a single table. FILTER, SUMMARIZE, ALL, ALLEXCEPT, almost all of the time intelligence functions, ADDCOLUMNS, GENERATE, etc. etc. etc. If you're filtering two tables then you need two filtering functions, in this case two ALLEXCEPT functions.

 

The exception to this would be if you want to filter a single table based on a combination of conditions in that table and conditions in a related table. In that case you could nest ALLEXCEPT inside a FILTER and use RELATED to check a column in a related table. This only works in N:1 relationships, unless you want to get crazy with some combination of VALUES and RELATEDTABLE that I won't get into right now. Anyway, example:

 

Measure = CALCULATE(
	SUM(FactTable[NumberColumn]),
	FILTER(
		ALLEXCEPT(
			FactTable,
			FactTable[CategoryColumn]
		),
		FactTable[ConditionColumn] = "foo" &&
		RELATED(DimensionTable[StatusColumn]) = "xyzzy"
	)
)

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Anonymous
Not applicable

Yes, and yes. ALL removes all filters including row context filters, visual level, page level, and report level filters. ALLEXCEPT(TableName, TableName[WhateverColumnIsInTheReportLevelFilter]) will preserve the report level filter but remove all other filters.

So when I want to preserve filters from two tables, I have to use allexcept twice

Anonymous
Not applicable

Yes. Any filtering-type functions will return a single table. FILTER, SUMMARIZE, ALL, ALLEXCEPT, almost all of the time intelligence functions, ADDCOLUMNS, GENERATE, etc. etc. etc. If you're filtering two tables then you need two filtering functions, in this case two ALLEXCEPT functions.

 

The exception to this would be if you want to filter a single table based on a combination of conditions in that table and conditions in a related table. In that case you could nest ALLEXCEPT inside a FILTER and use RELATED to check a column in a related table. This only works in N:1 relationships, unless you want to get crazy with some combination of VALUES and RELATEDTABLE that I won't get into right now. Anyway, example:

 

Measure = CALCULATE(
	SUM(FactTable[NumberColumn]),
	FILTER(
		ALLEXCEPT(
			FactTable,
			FactTable[CategoryColumn]
		),
		FactTable[ConditionColumn] = "foo" &&
		RELATED(DimensionTable[StatusColumn]) = "xyzzy"
	)
)

Helpful resources

Announcements
New to Fabric survey Carousel

New to Fabric Survey

If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.

Power BI DataViz World Championships carousel

Power BI DataViz World Championships - June 2026

A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.

Join our Fabric User Panel

Join our Fabric User Panel

Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.

March Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Community Update - March 2026

Check out the March 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.