Hi @vasalari ,
Glad to hear it's working fine. I’ll mark this as the accepted solution so it can help other community members who might face a similar issue.
Thank You.
Join us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to pass exam PL-300. The first session starts on June 11th. See you there!
Get registeredJoin us at FabCon Vienna from September 15-18, 2025, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM. Get registered
Is it possible to copy tables from on-premise SQL data warehouse to Fabric data warehouse directly using Getway.
I understand we can do it by copying to Lakehouse and then to Warehouse. I have huge tables and this happens daily. I need direct to data warehouse
In SQL, there are several tasks we typically perform, such as analyzing execution plans, creating or updating indexes, identifying and terminating blocking queries, and monitoring resource usage. However, I'm wondering how these tasks are handled within Microsoft Fabric.
Specifically:
How do you check the execution plan and optimize queries without using indexes?
How can you identify which queries are blocking others or consuming excessive resources?
How do you manage session resources, such as killing sessions that use too much?
Is there a way to monitor schema or table capacity usage in Fabric?
Is there an alternative to materialized views for pre-computing and storing query results for performance optimization in Fabric?
How can I replicate the functionality of synonyms in Fabric, or how should I handle object references across different databases or schemas?
What are the recommended alternatives to temporary tables for session-based or short-lived data storage in Fabric?
How can I monitor schema or table-level capacity usage in Fabric to track resource consumption?
Actually looking for Daiyly activities of DBA
Hi @SQL_Data_101 ,
In Microsoft Fabric, cross database queries and the use of synonyms common in traditional SQL Server environments are not currently supported. Instead, the recommended approach is to use Lakehouse shortcuts, which allow you to reference tables from other Lakehouses or even across workspaces without physically duplicating the data. This method is effective in Lakehouse scenarios.
However, within a Data Warehouse, the current limitation requires that all tables involved in joins be located in the same workspace and warehouse. Therefore, it may be necessary to replicate or move the required tables to ensure compatibility and seamless querying.
This approach offers flexibility in Lakehouse environments, but for Warehouse based use cases, it is essential to plan your data structure within workspace boundaries to support your query requirements.
Here is a community idea request pointing out the lack of synonyms in Fabric Warehouse and noting that it's still an open request synonyms are not currently supported.
Support Synonyms in Fabric Warehouse - Microsoft Fabric Community
Helpful References:
Unify data sources with OneLake shortcuts - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn
SQL database Overview (Preview) - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn
Regards,
Yugandhar.
I Have DataWarehouse_1 (DW) in WorkSpace_1 (WS) and DW_2 in WS_2. Using shortcut thru Lakehouse I join tables from two DWs. It is working for me
Hi @vasalari ,
Glad to hear it's working fine. I’ll mark this as the accepted solution so it can help other community members who might face a similar issue.
Thank You.
Hi @vasalari ,
Could you please confirm if you've submitted this as an idea in the Ideas Forum? If so, sharing the link here would be helpful for other community members who may have similar feedback.
If we don’t hear back, we’ll go ahead and close this thread. For any further discussions or questions, please start a new thread in the Microsoft Fabric Community Forum we’ll be happy to assist.
Thank you for being part of the Microsoft Fabric Community.
— Yugandhar
Community Support Team.
Hello @vasalari ,
Could you let us know if your issue has been resolved or if you are still experiencing difficulties? Your feedback is valuable to the community and can help others facing similar problems.
Thank You.
Hi @vasalari ,
Could you please confirm whether your issue has been resolved or if you are still experiencing any problems? Your feedback is valuable to the community as it helps others who might be facing a similar issue.
If the issue is resolved, please mark it as the Accepted Solution to assist others in the community in finding the answer more easily.
Regards,
Yugandhar.
Hi @vasalari ,
Thanks for contacting the Microsoft Fabric Community. As @nilendraFabric mentioned, direct gateway to warehouse ingestion is not supported yet because Fabric Warehouse requires external staging, unlike Lakehouse's native OneLake integration.
Additionally, the Dataflows Gen2 approach can load data directly into the warehouse if configured correctly, but it may face challenges with very large datasets.
Given your large tables and daily loads, We recommend the following.
If you have ideas to share, please visit the following link
https://ideas.fabric.microsoft.com/ideas/search-ideas/
If there is any post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hello @vasalari
Copying data directly from an on-premises SQL data warehouse to a Fabric data warehouse using the gateway is not currently supported, requiring an intermediate step through a lakehouse.
Dataflows Gen2 can bypass staging requirements and load directly into Warehouse if configured correctly, though this method has limitations for large datasets
https://datamozart.substack.com/p/how-to-bring-sql-server-data-into
The limitation stems from Fabric Warehouse’s reliance on external staging for pipeline ingestion, unlike Lakehouse’s native OneLake integration. Microsoft has acknowledged this inconsistency ,but direct gateway-to-warehouse transfers remain on the roadmap without a confirmed ETA
if this is helpful please accept the answer and give kudos
User | Count |
---|---|
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
User | Count |
---|---|
5 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |