The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends August 31st. Request your voucher.
Hi
I have to execute @sql with sp_executesql. This is defined as NVARCHAR(MAX). However the nvarchar is limited to 4000 characters and the query is getting truncated. I cannot split the query as it is automatically generated. How can I run queries which are more than 4000 characters and need to be in a variable.
DECLARE @sql as NVARCHAR(MAX);
EXEC sp_executesql @sql
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Anonymous,
Thanks for your update.
What you're experiencing is expected behaviour in SQL Server:
Here are the few steps you can consider:
If you find this information useful, please accept it as a solution and give it a 'Kudos' to assist others in locating it easily.
Thank you.
Try:
DECLARE @sql as NVARCHAR(MAX);
SET @sql = CONCAT (CAST('' AS NVARCHAR(MAX)), 'SELECT ... ');
EXEC sp_executesql @sql
=>
Microsoft documents this behavior with regard to the use of nvarchar(max) with sp_executesql. The official documentation notes that sp_executesql accepts a parameter of type nvarchar(max), which theoretically allows processing of strings up to 2^31-1 characters. However, there are practical limitations, especially when strings are passed directly as literals or concatenated.
A common problem arises when a long SQL string is passed directly as a literal to sp_executesql. In such cases, SQL Server treats the literal as nvarchar(4000) by default, which results in truncation of the string if it exceeds 4000 characters. This behavior is described in various community discussions and technical articles.
To work around this problem, it is recommended to store the SQL string in a variable of type nvarchar(max) and pass this variable to sp_executesql. This ensures that the entire string is processed without truncation. This practice is recommended in Microsoft documentation and various technical articles.
In summary, correct handling of nvarchar(max) in conjunction with sp_executesql is critical to avoiding string truncation issues. It is important to be aware of the default limits and take appropriate measures to ensure that long SQL statements are processed completely.
Try:
DECLARE @sql as NVARCHAR(MAX);
SET @sql = CONCAT (CAST('' AS NVARCHAR(MAX)), 'SELECT ... ');
EXEC sp_executesql @sql
=>
Microsoft documents this behavior with regard to the use of nvarchar(max) with sp_executesql. The official documentation notes that sp_executesql accepts a parameter of type nvarchar(max), which theoretically allows processing of strings up to 2^31-1 characters. However, there are practical limitations, especially when strings are passed directly as literals or concatenated.
A common problem arises when a long SQL string is passed directly as a literal to sp_executesql. In such cases, SQL Server treats the literal as nvarchar(4000) by default, which results in truncation of the string if it exceeds 4000 characters. This behavior is described in various community discussions and technical articles.
To work around this problem, it is recommended to store the SQL string in a variable of type nvarchar(max) and pass this variable to sp_executesql. This ensures that the entire string is processed without truncation. This practice is recommended in Microsoft documentation and various technical articles.
In summary, correct handling of nvarchar(max) in conjunction with sp_executesql is critical to avoiding string truncation issues. It is important to be aware of the default limits and take appropriate measures to ensure that long SQL statements are processed completely.
Hi @Anonymous,
May I ask if you have resolved this issue? If so, please mark the helpful reply and accept it as the solution. This will be helpful for other community members who have similar problems to solve it faster.
Thank you.
Hi @Anonymous ,
Could you kindly assist me with the details I mentioned in my previous response? Additionally, I would appreciate it if you could provide a description.
Thank you.
Hi @Anonymous,
Thanks for reaching out to the Microsoft fabric community forum.
We understand that your query is automatically generated, and you’re facing an issue where NVARCHAR(MAX) seems to be limited to 4000 characters, causing truncation when executing with sp_executesql.
To better assist you, could you clarify the following?
Where are you executing the query?
How is your SQL query being generated and assigned to @sql?
Are you seeing the truncation before or after executing sp_executesql?
Once we have these details, we’ll be able to provide a better solution.
Thank you.
Hi,
a) We are executing the query from Stored Procedures in Warehouse.
b) Two ways we are creating SQL.
i) SET @sql=' sql statements ' + @tablename +'where ' +@condition
ii) SET @sql = 'select column from information_server where tablename='+@tablename;
Both cases when I print(@sql), the query is getting truncated.
Hi @Anonymous,
Thanks for providing the details. Since you are executing the query from Stored Procedures in a Fabric Data Warehouse and the truncation happens before execution, the issue is likely due to implicit conversion to NVARCHAR(4000) when assigning the query.
If this information is helpful, please Accept it as a solution and give a "kudos" to assist other community members in resolving similar issues more efficiently.
Thank you.
When we print the result (PRINT @sql) it still truncates the sql. If we write the statement select @sql, it displays the entire sql, but then the stored proc stops at that point and doesn't move ahead.
Hi @Anonymous,
Thanks for your update.
What you're experiencing is expected behaviour in SQL Server:
Here are the few steps you can consider:
If you find this information useful, please accept it as a solution and give it a 'Kudos' to assist others in locating it easily.
Thank you.
Hi @Anonymous,
I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any further questions or if you'd like to discuss this further. If this answers your question, please accept it as a solution and give it a 'Kudos' so other community members with similar problems can find a solution faster.
Thank you.
User | Count |
---|---|
6 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |
User | Count |
---|---|
20 | |
18 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 |