Supplies are limited. Contact info@espc.tech right away to save your spot before the conference sells out.
Get your discountScore big with last-minute savings on the final tickets to FabCon Vienna. Secure your discount
I'm struggling to get estimate missing numbers based on a pair of actual figures
Table1 is a complete information
Ranking | Sales |
3 | 82,967.41 |
46 | 44,405.98 |
52 | 42,306.70 |
103 | 32,884.98 |
111 | 31,854.20 |
123 | 30,021.46 |
134 | 28,735.09 |
160 | 25,503.01 |
169 | 24,626.69 |
185 | 23,213.10 |
192 | 22,175.79 |
208 | 20,877.77 |
214 | 20,370.58 |
248 | 17,722.25 |
299 | 13,091.64 |
300 | 12,918.88 |
307 | 12,153.49 |
308 | 12,121.66 |
324 | 11,089.06 |
361 | 8,369.43 |
365 | 8,175.49 |
408 | 5,769.83 |
409 | 5,599.31 |
411 | 5,520.38 |
432 | 4,439.53 |
468 | 2,802.01 |
And Table2:
Ranking | Sales |
1 | |
2 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | |
19 | |
20 | |
21 | |
22 | |
23 | |
24 | |
25 | |
26 | |
27 | |
28 | |
29 | |
30 | |
31 | |
32 | |
33 | |
34 | |
35 | |
36 | |
37 | |
38 | |
39 | |
40 | |
41 | |
42 | |
43 | |
44 | |
45 | |
47 | |
48 | |
49 | |
50 | |
51 | |
53 | |
54 | |
55 | |
56 | |
57 | |
58 | |
59 | |
60 | |
61 | |
62 | |
63 | |
64 | |
65 | |
66 | |
67 | |
68 | |
69 | |
70 |
Is there any way I can calculate the correlation in Table 1 and predict all sales in Table 2?
The ranking is just purely based on the sales.
Thanks!
HI @Jay_Lu,
I suppose the ranking formulas are calculated based on the detail level records, when you use it on table visual these records have been aggregated the sales values with the current category.
For this scenario, I think you may need to change the formula to ranking records based on group. You can take a look at the following blog if helps:
RANKX on multiple columns with DAX and Power BI - SQLBI
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
Hi Xiaoxin,
Thanks for your suggestion, but my case would be different.
So the ranking is actually from an extenral source, and I lookupvalue the sales via the person's name.
By saying that, we know all people's ranking, and some salespersons' sales firgues, and now we want to estimate those missing sales with confirmed rankings.
I initially thought to calculate the correlation between known rankings and turnover, and then use a model to predict the missing values. But just don't know how to. maybe there is other way
User | Count |
---|---|
13 | |
8 | |
8 | |
7 | |
5 |
User | Count |
---|---|
21 | |
15 | |
15 | |
10 | |
7 |