March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
I am attempting to calculate an inverse running total on values. So I would in essence start with a value, 100, and in an indexed format reduce that value based on the next indexed field.
Example:
Index | Value | Running Difference |
1 | 100 | 100 |
2 | 10 | 90 |
3 | 40 | 50 |
4 | 40 | 10 |
5 | 20 | -10 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
Running Diff =
MINX( FILTER( INFO, INFO[Index] = 1 ), INFO[Value] )
- SUMX(
FILTER( INFO, 1 < INFO[Index] && INFO[Index] <= EARLIER( INFO[Index] ) ),
INFO[Value]
)
Thanks to the great efforts by MS engineers to simplify syntax of DAX! Most beginners are SUCCESSFULLY MISLED to think that they could easily master DAX; but it turns out that the intricacy of the most frequently used RANKX() is still way beyond their comprehension! |
DAX is simple, but NOT EASY! |
Running Diff =
MINX( FILTER( INFO, INFO[Index] = 1 ), INFO[Value] )
- SUMX(
FILTER( INFO, 1 < INFO[Index] && INFO[Index] <= EARLIER( INFO[Index] ) ),
INFO[Value]
)
Thanks to the great efforts by MS engineers to simplify syntax of DAX! Most beginners are SUCCESSFULLY MISLED to think that they could easily master DAX; but it turns out that the intricacy of the most frequently used RANKX() is still way beyond their comprehension! |
DAX is simple, but NOT EASY! |
This solved my needs, thank you very much!
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
19 | |
19 | |
16 | |
8 | |
5 |
User | Count |
---|---|
36 | |
28 | |
16 | |
15 | |
12 |