The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredCompete to become Power BI Data Viz World Champion! First round ends August 18th. Get started.
The (2) images on the left are what the data looks like in the software that is being exported into MS BI.
MS BI is interpreting them as shown in the right image.
The Slicer for both the Category & Feature needs to be split as on the left image but MS BI is creating an entry for every unique selection as shown on the right.
When downloading either of these fields into .csv they appear separated by semi-colon.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hello @GabeFig,
Thanks for sharing the sample data.
I have reproduced your scenario using the sample data you shared and implemented the required filtering logic based on multi-valued Categories and Features columns (with delimiters like ;).
Output:
For your reference, I’m attaching the .pbix file.
Best regards,
Ganesh Singamshetty
Hello @GabeFig,
Hope everything’s going great on your end! Just checking in has the issue been resolved, or are you still running into problems? Sharing an update can really help others facing the same thing.
Thank you.
Thank you & I apologize for not responding earlier as I was out a couple of days. I did not expect such quick response as this is my 1st time seeking help.
Hello @GabeFig,
Thank you for reaching out to the Microsoft Fabric Forum Community.
Power BI treats these fields as text strings when imported, rather than recognizing them as separate selectable items.
To resolve this, you can use Power BI's "Split Column" feature to break the semicolon-separated values into rows. Here’s a general approach:
If this information is helpful, please “Accept as solution” and give a "kudos" to assist other community members in resolving similar issues more efficiently.
Thank you.
I went through your steps as well as refreshed but the data seems to be the same. I do not see any new columns to use in the Slicer.
Maybe this has to be rebuild rom scratch
Hello @GabeFig,
Thanks for the follow-up.
The issue might be due to the field being split into columns instead of rows, or possibly a modeling step was skipped. Let me walk you through the approach again, this time with clarity on creating a slicer-ready field:
Best Regards,
Ganesh singamshetty.
Thanks Ganesh for the more detailed instruction BUT that seems to be what I did.
I could not tell there was anything different even after the original slicer was removed and recreated w/ Category field that was split (by rows).
Below are some screenshots of what was done with the existing MS BI.I wonder that this needs to be done completely from scratch to work.
Both Catefory & Feature were done. The split was done by Row.
I also checked to see if there was a hidden CR or LF or CRLF but there were none.
Hello @GabeFig,
Thanks for sharing your detailed screenshots and you’ve done a great job applying the split correctly. I now suspect the issue is not with the split step itself, but with how Power BI handles row-level filtering from slicers in a 1-to-many relationship scenario.
To make the slicers work properly without affecting or duplicating your main data table:
If the issue persists, try to share your .pbix file or sample data so I can better understand the scenario and give you the necessary solution.
Thank you.
Hi @GabeFig,
Thanks again for your detailed follow-up and for sharing the screenshot.
What you're seeing with the "Business" category behaving differently is due to how Power BI handles split-to-rows transformations on delimited text. When a category like "Application; Business" is split, Power BI creates separate rows one with "Application", and another with "Business". However, "Business" also appears as a standalone value in other rows, which may result in multiple "Business" values in your slicer or inconsistent filtering behavior.
To make sure the "Business" category filters all relevant rows whether it appears alone or with others. We suggest the following steps:
Duplicate your main table and name it CategoryMapping.
If the issue persists try to share your sample data: How to provide sample data in the Power BI Forum - Microsoft Fabric Community
Best Regards,
Ganesh singamshetty.
The CategoryMapping & FeatureMapping look great but again if 'application' is selected it will show only those that have just 'application'.
If the item has 'application; cloud' then that will not show.
If 'application' & 'cloud' are chosen then only those that have either 'application' or 'cloud' but not those that have 'application; cloud'.
The problem seems to be the Manage Relationship' I've tried several if not all variations.
It seems best to use the Categories field cause if the Records ID# is used it only returns (1) as w/ the Feature
Hi @GabeFig,
Thanks again for the follow-up and the screenshot.
To better assist you, could you please provide sample data that fully reflects the issue? Kindly share the data in a usable format (such as Excel or a simple table), not as a screenshot. The sample should:
If you're unsure how to provide data in the forum, please refer to this helpful guide:
How to provide sample data in the Power BI Forum - Microsoft Fabric Community
Once we have that, I’ll be happy to help you resolve it.
Best regards,
Ganesh Singamshetty
Record ID# | Software/Service | Categories | Features |
705 | Zoominfo | Unknown | Unknown |
498 | Zoom Outlook add-in | Unknown | AI-Enabled |
559 | Zoom | Cloud | AI-Enabled;Communication |
707 | Zkipster | Unknown | Unknown |
997 | World Trademark Review | IP Management;Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
998 | World Intellectual Property Review | IP Management;Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
843 | Working Advantage | Unknown | Unknown |
589 | Work Management System | Application;Cloud | Unknown |
459 | WordRake | Unknown | Unknown |
277 | Word | Application;Business | Unknown |
999 | Women's Wear Daily | Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
557 | Windows OS | Application;Commercial | Unknown |
452 | WinDJView | Unknown | Unknown |
995 | Win Remote | Business | Unknown |
1003 | Washington Business Journal | Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
851 | Walkingspree App | Application | Unknown |
1006 | VitalLaw | Legal & Market Research;Legal Education | Unknown |
948 | Vault Verify | Automation | Unknown |
961 | Valimail | Regulatory & Compliance | Unknown |
590 | Vacation Reporting Tool | Unknown | Unknown |
910 | V Drive File Share | Collaboration & Communication | Unknown |
423 | USDHS Check Requests | Application;Cloud | Unknown |
1007 | USCIS Policy Manual | Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
945 | U Drive File Share | Collaboration & Communication | Unknown |
954 | Tritech | Collaboration & Communication | Unknown |
884 | Trexo Global | IP Management | Unknown |
980 | Travelling Coaches | Legal Education | Unknown |
1014 | Trademark Navigator | Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
580 | Ticket Tracker | Application;Cloud | Unknown |
988 | Threat Manager | Regulatory & Compliance | Unknown |
1002 | The Washington Post | Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
1036 | The Kluwer IP Law Manual | IP Management;Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
588 | Task Management System | Application;Cloud | Unknown |
909 | T Drive File Share | Collaboration & Communication;Project Management | Unknown |
601 | Synchronizer Player | Unknown | Unknown |
717 | Symphony Web Services Admin | Unknown | Unknown |
798 | Swoogo | Unknown | Unknown |
1063 | Supreme Court Brief | Legal & Market Research | Unknown |
759 | Supabase | Unknown | Unknown |
708 | SunIP | Unknown | IP Management;Legal Analysis & Strategy |
Hello @GabeFig,
Thanks for sharing the sample data.
I have reproduced your scenario using the sample data you shared and implemented the required filtering logic based on multi-valued Categories and Features columns (with delimiters like ;).
Output:
For your reference, I’m attaching the .pbix file.
Best regards,
Ganesh Singamshetty
Ganesh
Thank you so very much!
I believe I have got the BI showing as requested.
Your patience is above and beyond!
Gabe
@GabeFig Perhaps try creating a group column (right-click the column and choose "New group"). Group your values into your desired buckets and then use this new column in your slicer.
User | Count |
---|---|
26 | |
10 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 |
User | Count |
---|---|
32 | |
13 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 |