Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!To celebrate FabCon Vienna, we are offering 50% off select exams. Ends October 3rd. Request your discount now.
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to create a treemap where the lowest values have the biggest portions on the treemap as opposed to how it is now?
For example, if I have 5 names and values like:
Billy - 5,
Chris - 4,
Josh - 3,
Lily - 2
Thomas - 1
then treemap will assign the biggest portion for Billy, and the lowest one for Thomas.
But what if I want to assign the biggest portion to Thomas, the guy with the lowest points? Is it possible to make a "reverse-treemap"?
Add a calculated column "6 - value" and use that for the treemap.
6 - value as a formula...seems not working...am I missing somehting perhaps?
Name |
Value | Reverse Treemap Value |
Billy |
5 | 1 |
Chris |
4 | 2 |
Josh |
3 | 3 |
Lily |
2 | 4 |
Thomas |
1 | 5 |