Power BI is turning 10! Tune in for a special live episode on July 24 with behind-the-scenes stories, product evolution highlights, and a sneak peek at what’s in store for the future.
Save the dateEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends August 31st. Request your voucher.
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to create a treemap where the lowest values have the biggest portions on the treemap as opposed to how it is now?
For example, if I have 5 names and values like:
Billy - 5,
Chris - 4,
Josh - 3,
Lily - 2
Thomas - 1
then treemap will assign the biggest portion for Billy, and the lowest one for Thomas.
But what if I want to assign the biggest portion to Thomas, the guy with the lowest points? Is it possible to make a "reverse-treemap"?
Add a calculated column "6 - value" and use that for the treemap.
6 - value as a formula...seems not working...am I missing somehting perhaps?
Name |
Value | Reverse Treemap Value |
Billy |
5 | 1 |
Chris |
4 | 2 |
Josh |
3 | 3 |
Lily |
2 | 4 |
Thomas |
1 | 5 |
Check out the July 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.