Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to create a treemap where the lowest values have the biggest portions on the treemap as opposed to how it is now?
For example, if I have 5 names and values like:
Billy - 5,
Chris - 4,
Josh - 3,
Lily - 2
Thomas - 1
then treemap will assign the biggest portion for Billy, and the lowest one for Thomas.
But what if I want to assign the biggest portion to Thomas, the guy with the lowest points? Is it possible to make a "reverse-treemap"?
Add a calculated column "6 - value" and use that for the treemap.
6 - value as a formula...seems not working...am I missing somehting perhaps?
|
Name |
Value | Reverse Treemap Value |
|
Billy |
5 | 1 |
|
Chris |
4 | 2 |
|
Josh |
3 | 3 |
|
Lily |
2 | 4 |
|
Thomas |
1 | 5 |
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
Check out the November 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |