Find everything you need to get certified on Fabric—skills challenges, live sessions, exam prep, role guidance, and more. Get started
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"layer": [{
"mark": {
"type": "point",
"size": 1000,
"tooltip": true
},
"encoding": {
"y": {
"field": "Residual_Risk",
"type": "ordinal",
"sort": "Y"
},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "nominal",
"axis": {
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"size": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"rangeMax": 15000},
"type" : "quantitative"
},
"color": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"range": ["#F0E199", "#6D5A00"]},
"type" : "quantitative"
}
}
},
{
"mark": {
"type": "text",
"fontSize": 16,
"fontWeight": "400",
"color": "black"
},
"encoding": {
"y": {
"field": "Residual_Risk",
"type": "ordinal",
"sort": "-Y"
},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "ordinal",
"axis": {
"labelAngle": 0
}
},
"text": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"type": "quantitative"
}
}
}
]
}
this the Visualisation and this the code for the visualistion
I need to Sort the X-axis Averse, minimal, conservative,Flexible in that order and
I need to sort Y axis from Low to high
Solved! Go to Solution.
@Junato47, if you don't expect the axes values to change, you can use the following spec. There is also a way to implement a data-driven solution, but I believe this hard-coded method should suffice.
I removed the y sort from the text mark and also added top-level encoding for the sorting. If you need more help, just let me know, happy to help. If this gives you what you need, please mark this as the solution.
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"encoding": {
"x": {"sort": ["Averse", "Minimal", "Conservative", "Flexible"]},
"y": {"sort": ["High", "Medium", "Low"]}
},
"layer": [
{
"mark": {"type": "point", "size": 1000, "tooltip": true},
"encoding": {
"y": {"field": "Residual_Risk", "type": "ordinal", "sort": "Y"},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "nominal",
"axis": {"labelAngle": 0}
},
"size": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"rangeMax": 15000},
"type": "quantitative"
},
"color": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"range": ["#F0E199", "#6D5A00"]},
"type": "quantitative"
}
}
},
{
"mark": {
"type": "text",
"fontSize": 16,
"fontWeight": "400",
"color": "black"
},
"encoding": {
"y": {"field": "Residual_Risk", "type": "ordinal"},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "ordinal",
"axis": {"labelAngle": 0}
},
"text": {"field": "Count of Risk_ID", "type": "quantitative"}
}
}
]
}
@giammariam hi could you help me in this code, i would like to swap the axis, but more than that the color of the bubble should change not as per the size of the bubble, but instead we should use a color gradient. For eg:"If the residual Impact is "Very Low" and residual probability is "Very Low" it should be Green and if it is high it should be Red. i will show you an example
Here i have used a background, but i want the color change inside the bubble and the backgroud should be white. For the visualisation i used i have made the bubble fill color as transperent. Is it possible to change the colors of the bubble just like the background.
Hey @Junato47. I'd be happy to help. Can you do two things for me first?
@Junato47, if you don't expect the axes values to change, you can use the following spec. There is also a way to implement a data-driven solution, but I believe this hard-coded method should suffice.
I removed the y sort from the text mark and also added top-level encoding for the sorting. If you need more help, just let me know, happy to help. If this gives you what you need, please mark this as the solution.
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"encoding": {
"x": {"sort": ["Averse", "Minimal", "Conservative", "Flexible"]},
"y": {"sort": ["High", "Medium", "Low"]}
},
"layer": [
{
"mark": {"type": "point", "size": 1000, "tooltip": true},
"encoding": {
"y": {"field": "Residual_Risk", "type": "ordinal", "sort": "Y"},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "nominal",
"axis": {"labelAngle": 0}
},
"size": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"rangeMax": 15000},
"type": "quantitative"
},
"color": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"range": ["#F0E199", "#6D5A00"]},
"type": "quantitative"
}
}
},
{
"mark": {
"type": "text",
"fontSize": 16,
"fontWeight": "400",
"color": "black"
},
"encoding": {
"y": {"field": "Residual_Risk", "type": "ordinal"},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "ordinal",
"axis": {"labelAngle": 0}
},
"text": {"field": "Count of Risk_ID", "type": "quantitative"}
}
}
]
}
Hi @giammariam ,
Many thanks; everything went smoothly.
I don't know a lot about coding and I'm new to making custom visuals. Just curious if there are any other values, like: If there is Very High and Very Low on the Y-axis, will the code function if I add "y": "sort": ["Very High," "High," "Medium," "Low," "Very Low"]?
Yes that should work. Basically you want to add all the posible values for the axis into the sort array. Feel free to reach out if you need help on any deneb visuals in the future
i have one more thing to add this to this visual, i would need a 45 degree dashed line starting from the origin of the graph. i will show a reference image
@Junato47, try this:
{
"data": {"name": "dataset"},
"encoding": {
"x": {"sort": ["Averse", "Minimal", "Conservative", "Flexible"]},
"y": {"sort": ["High", "Medium", "Low"]}
},
"layer": [
{
"mark": {"type": "line", "color": "orange", "strokeDash": [7,10], "strokeDashOffset": 9, "strokeWidth": 1},
"data": {"values": [{"x": 0, "y": 0}, {"x": 1, "y": 1}]},
"encoding": {
"x": {"type": "quantitative", "field": "x", "axis": null},
"y": {"type": "quantitative", "field": "y", "axis": null}
}
},
{
"mark": {"type": "circle", "color": "orange", "size": 35},
"data": {"values": [{"x": 0, "y": 0}, {"x": 1, "y": 1}]},
"encoding": {
"x": {"type": "quantitative", "field": "x", "axis": null},
"y": {"type": "quantitative", "field": "y", "axis": null}
}
},
{
"layer": [
{
"mark": {"type": "point", "size": 1000, "tooltip": true},
"encoding": {
"y": {"field": "Residual_Risk", "type": "ordinal", "sort": "Y"},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "nominal",
"axis": {"labelAngle": 0}
},
"size": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"rangeMax": 15000},
"type": "quantitative"
},
"color": {
"field": "Count of Risk_ID",
"legend": null,
"scale": {"range": ["#F0E199", "#6D5A00"]},
"type": "quantitative"
}
}
},
{
"mark": {
"type": "text",
"fontSize": 16,
"fontWeight": "400",
"color": "black"
},
"encoding": {
"y": {"field": "Residual_Risk", "type": "ordinal"},
"x": {
"field": "Risk Appetite",
"type": "ordinal",
"axis": {"labelAngle": 0}
},
"text": {"field": "Count of Risk_ID", "type": "quantitative"}
}
}
]
}
]
}
hi @giammariam , I am aware that my doubts are giving you a lot of trouble.
Another question I have is whether it is possible to determine whether the risks that cross the diagonal dashed line inside the graph are "within appetite" or "out of appetite." The risks (i.e., the data field that the bubble represents) are "out of appetite" if they are over the dashed line. The risk is "within appetite" if they are crossing the dashed line. You can gain a better understanding of the issue if you refer to the accompanying photograph.
Hey @Junato47. Looking at this now. I'm a bit unclear of what you mean by "cross the diagnal line" and "over the dashed line." Just trying to make sure I understand. If the circle marks appear above the 45 degree line then they are "within appetite"? If they are below the 45 degree line then they are "out of appetite"? Or is it if the circles are lying directly along the diagnal line, they are "within appetitie"?
Also, how would you like the appetite indicated? As a mark (e.g. text)? as a symbol next to the circle? as a tooltip? something else?
Thanks.
Hi @giammariam If the circles appear above and below the 45 degree line they are "out of appetite" and if the circles are lying directly along the diagonal line they are "within appetite". I don't want to display them in this particular visual. I require it to be displayed as a KPI. I can use it for different graphics, such as showing a count of risks that are "not within appetite" as a KPI.
Thank you @giammariam For me, it performed flawlessly. I appreciate your support.
Yes Sure thank you
Check out the September 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Learn from experts, get hands-on experience, and win awesome prizes.
User | Count |
---|---|
27 | |
11 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 |