Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Vote for your favorite vizzies from the Power BI Dataviz World Championship submissions. Vote now!

Reply
Anonymous
Not applicable

Power BI Permissions Management Process

I am curious what everyone is using to manage permissions in Fabric/Power BI. 

 

When using live pointers to semantic models, users need permissions on both the report and the dataset. The report may be owned by an analyst but the dataset is owned by the IT team. If there is RLS on a dataset that adds another layer to it. With new Fabric permissions coming I can imagine this will add another layer of complexity. 

 

Currently today, we are using Azure Entra ID groups. We have used Power Apps in combination with Approvals for users to request access and data owners to approve. In most cases, we expose reports using a Power BI App. I have audiences set up so if users do not have access to the content of the app they see the embedded Power App with directions on how to request permission. However, some users are still getting links directly to the reports in the workspace and not the app so they click the "Get access to this report". It is causing a lot of confusion. 

Also as we move towards Fabri and OneLake I would like to make sure I am thinking of how to best organize the permissions as we anticipate having to implement a lot of RLS on the data in the lake . 

 

What is everyone else doing? Curious if there are better processes we have not explored. Thanks!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Anonymous
Not applicable

You are currently on the right path, even when Fabric artifacts get integrated. The dataset (semenatic model) and report are not going to change if you use Import mode. If you use Direct Lake, there will be permissions needed for the data but you can still use the save groups you are using now with datasets. That is IF you are going to use Direct Lake. Currently, Import mode is still faster unless you need 'near real-time' data AND you have a very large dataset (like 200+ GB in size, which is pretty large).

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Anonymous
Not applicable

You are currently on the right path, even when Fabric artifacts get integrated. The dataset (semenatic model) and report are not going to change if you use Import mode. If you use Direct Lake, there will be permissions needed for the data but you can still use the save groups you are using now with datasets. That is IF you are going to use Direct Lake. Currently, Import mode is still faster unless you need 'near real-time' data AND you have a very large dataset (like 200+ GB in size, which is pretty large).

Helpful resources

Announcements
Power BI DataViz World Championships

Power BI Dataviz World Championships

Vote for your favorite vizzies from the Power BI World Championship submissions!

Sticker Challenge 2026 Carousel

Join our Community Sticker Challenge 2026

If you love stickers, then you will definitely want to check out our Community Sticker Challenge!

January Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - January 2026

Check out the January 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.