Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more

Bibiano_Geraldo

Great-Looking Dashboard, Bad Decisions: How Poor Data Preparation Misleads Your Analysis

Picture the scene: a sleek, interactive Power BI dashboard. Colorful bar charts, prominent KPIs, and a flawless design. Everything looks perfect. But there's a silent, dangerous problem: the numbers are lying.

Impactful visualizations aren't born from pretty charts, but from well-understood, clean, and properly modeled data. The rush to create visuals without first investigating the raw material is one of the most common and costly mistakes in the world of Business Intelligence.

This article reveals, with a practical and shocking example, how a lack of exploratory analysis and modeling can create dangerous "truths" and lead to disastrous business decisions.

 

The Incomplete Data Trap: A Real-World Scenario

You're given a mission: create a ranking of the top-performing countries by sales volume between 2010 and 2020. Your data model is simple:

Bibiano_Geraldo_0-1752748915118.png

 

Eager to show results, you write a simple average measure in DAX:

Average Sales = AVERAGE('Table'[Gross Sales])


The result instantly appears on your chart:

Preliminary (and Misleading) Ranking

Bibiano_Geraldo_4-1752748814555.png

 

The conclusion seems obvious: Mozambique's performance was spectacular, more than double that of Canada! But this conclusion is dangerously wrong.

A minimally curious analysis would reveal that Mozambique has only a single sales record in the entire 11-year period. Meanwhile, Canada demonstrated consistency year after year. Mozambique's "average" isn't an average at all; it's just an isolated data point.

 

The Diagnosis: It's Not DAX's Fault, It's a Lack of Preparation

The problem here isn't the AVERAGE function. The tool did exactly what it was asked to do. The real culprit is applying a calculation to raw, untreated, and misunderstood data.

This is a symptom of unhealthy analysis. Other common symptoms include:

  • Missing Values (Blanks): They distort averages, sums, and counts, either inflating or deflating results.
  • Incomplete Time Series: They make comparisons between periods, products, or regions completely invalid.
  • Extreme Outliers: A single anomalous value can drastically skew a sum or average, masking the standard behavior.
  • Lack of Normalization: Comparing total sales between a country with 200 million people and another with 10 million is a recipe for false insights.

Without a preliminary diagnosis, any KPI – be it an average, sum, or percentage growth – can become a vector of misinformation.

 

The Bill Comes Due: The Consequences of a False Insight

Skipping the data preparation step isn't a shortcut; it's a risk that can be incredibly expensive:

  • Burned Capital: Directing investments into a market that looks promising (like Mozambique in our example) but lacks a consistent history or reliable data.
  • Logistical Chaos: Planning inventory and operations based on sales peaks that are actually outliers or data errors, leading to stockouts or overstocking.
  • Loss of Trust: When decisions based on dashboards fail to produce expected results, the credibility of the BI department and its analysts is the first thing questioned.
  • Strategic Suicide: Launching marketing campaigns or planning expansions into regions whose potential was measured incorrectly, wasting time, effort, and money.

 

The Conscious Analyst's Arsenal: Best Practices That Save Projects

To avoid these traps, an effective data analyst doesn't cut corners. They follow a deliberate process.

1. Investigate First (Exploratory Analysis)

Before writing a single line of DAX for a KPI, use Power BI to investigate. Create simple tables and temporary line charts to answer questions like:

  • Is the data distribution by year complete for all entities (countries, products)?
  • Are there absurd peaks or valleys (outliers)?
  • What is the frequency of null or blank values?

2. Treat the Data at the Source (Power Query and Modeling)

The best way to handle problematic data is in Power Query, before it even reaches the data model.

  • Fill or remove missing values consciously and with documentation.
  • Normalize the data: Create columns with relative metrics (e.g., Sales per Capita, Sales per Store).
  • Create supporting columns: Flag outliers or historical consistency ("Years with Valid Data", "Is Outlier?").

3. Calculate Safely (Robust DAX)

Functions like AVERAGE or SUM are powerful but naive. Create measures that protect themselves from incomplete data. The corrected version of our average shouldn't just divide by the number of years with data, but by the total years in the period for a fair comparison.

Average Sales (Corrected) = 
VAR TotalYearsInPeriod =
    CALCULATE (
        DISTINCTCOUNT ( 'Table'[Year] ),
        ALL ( 'Table'[Country] ) 
    )
    
VAR TotalSales = SUM ( 'Table'[Gross Sales] )

RETURN
DIVIDE ( TotalSales, TotalYearsInPeriod )

 

With this measure, the value for Mozambique would be 245 / 11 = 22.27, revealing the true story.

Bibiano_Geraldo_3-1752748695896.png

 

4. Communicate with Transparency

Your dashboards should tell the whole story, including the limitations.

  • Use tooltips to explain how a KPI is calculated.
  • Add a card or note that states, "Data available for X of the 11 years analyzed," when a user filters a country.

 

Conclusion: Deliver Trust, Not Just Charts

A dashboard isn't a work of art; it's a decision-making tool. And a tool is only useful if it's reliable.

The true magic of Power BI isn't in the beauty of its visuals, but in its ability to translate raw data into strategic truth. And that truth is only achieved through rigor, curiosity, and a commitment to data preparation.

So, the next time you open Power BI, remember: your job isn't just to create pretty charts. It's to build a foundation of trust. It's to deliver the truth.

Comments