Forum Discussion

AurelAll's avatar
AurelAll
New Member
1 year ago

How to Ensure Comprehensive Agent Data in Teams CQD Historical Reports?

Hi everyone,

 

I’ve been working on analyzing data from Microsoft Teams CQD (Call Quality Dashboard) Historical Reports. I’m pulling dimensions and measures as outlined in the official documentation (link: Microsoft CQD Historical Reports Documentation) into our database for historical tracking.

 

However, I’ve encountered a challenge:

  1. Lack of Agent Details: I’m particularly interested in identifying agents (e.g., names or emails of individuals handling calls), but the dataset seems to have very limited information of this kind.
  2. Potential Source: I suspect this information might be contained in the SecondUPN field, but most rows in this column are empty in my current data.
  3. Future Data Completeness: How can I ensure this field or similar ones are populated more consistently in future datasets?

 

I’d greatly appreciate insights from anyone familiar with Teams CQD, particularly:

  • Is SecondUPN indeed the right field for identifying agents in scenarios like call queues or transfers?
  • Are there settings or configurations in Teams (or related systems like Auto Attendants or Call Queues) that need to be adjusted to collect this information accurately?
  • Any best practices for ensuring comprehensive agent-related data in CQD exports?

 

Thanks in advance for your help! Your advice will be incredibly useful for improving our analysis.

3 Replies