Forum Discussion

JoRo50's avatar
JoRo50
Frequent Visitor
4 years ago
Solved

calculation to show value for NOT variable

Hello,  I'm trying to create a measure to show a calculation for values other than the variable indicated in the row label.  For instance, in the data below (Table), I want to be able to do a calcul...
Need Help
Tips and Tricks
  • AUaero's avatar
    AUaero
    4 years ago

    Using the data table you provided, you can create two measures to get the desired result:

    # Avg Value = AVERAGE(FilterTable[Value])
    # Avg Not Value = 
VAR ThisVariable = MAX(FilterTable[Variable])

RETURN
CALCULATE(
    [# Avg Value],
    FILTER(
        ALL(FilterTable),
        NOT(FilterTable[Variable] = ThisVariable)
    ),
    VALUES(FilterTable[Filter])
)

    Here are the results when no Filter slicer is applied:

    And with the Filter slicer:

    Please accept this as the solution if this solves your problem.

     

     

AUaero's avatar
AUaero
Responsive Resident
4 years ago

Using the data table you provided, you can create two measures to get the desired result:

# Avg Value = AVERAGE(FilterTable[Value])
# Avg Not Value = 
VAR ThisVariable = MAX(FilterTable[Variable])

RETURN
CALCULATE(
    [# Avg Value],
    FILTER(
        ALL(FilterTable),
        NOT(FilterTable[Variable] = ThisVariable)
    ),
    VALUES(FilterTable[Filter])
)

Here are the results when no Filter slicer is applied:

And with the Filter slicer:

Please accept this as the solution if this solves your problem.

 

 

JoRo50's avatar
JoRo50
Frequent Visitor
4 years ago

AUaero Is there a solution if I am being asked to add a second filter (Filter2) to this table? With 2 filters, the Not Value calculation should still calculate based on the values remaining after the filters have been selected.

 

(I also noticed that my example for Filter B, Variable Y should have an Avg Not Value of 18.5.  Thank you for correcting that oversight.)

 

Thank you.