Forum Discussion
Waterfall variation by sales type
Thanks for your response. Unfortunately that didn't work for me.
I'm getting a constant figure in the Periods column:
Be aware that this is a measure an not a calculated column that I use to show the percentages.
If you can share some data I can try to simulate and redefine the formula.
MFelix
- goyasor9 years agoFrequent Visitor
Here's the raw data I used in Excel:
Manufactuter Category 2015 Sales 2016 Sales Variance 2015-16 GM Country A 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 GM Country B 1,000,000 2,400,000 1,400,000 Ford Country A 3,000,000 1,900,000 -1,100,000 Ford Country B 4,000,000 3,000,000 -1,000,000 Toyota Country A 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Toyota Country B 3,000,000 3,800,000 800,000 Honda Country A 2,000,000 1,000,000 -1,000,000 Honda Country B 2,500,000 2,000,000 -500,000 Chrysler Country A 500,000 900,000 400,000 Chrysler Country B 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 TOTAL 19,000,000 21,000,000 I used it to create this summary table (also in Excel):
2015 Sales 19,000,000 GM 2,400,000 Ford -2,100,000 Toyota 1,800,000 Honda -1,500,000 Chrysler 1,400,000 2016 Sales 21,000,000 Then finally the Waterfall chart:
- Vvelarde9 years ago
Community Champion
Hi, One Way to obtain this :
Create a New Table (Modeling Menu)
Table = UNION ( SUMMARIZECOLUMNS ( Table1[Manufacturer], "Variation", SUM ( Table1[2016 Sales] ) - SUM ( Table1[2015 Sales] ) ), ROW ( "Manufacturer,; "2015 Sales", "Variation", SUM ( Table1[2015 Sales] ) ) )After That, Use the Waterfall Chart with the fields of the new table
- Anonymous9 years agoNot applicable
Hello Vvelarde could you share the pbix template? im trying to simulate what you did because this solution will help me to extrapolate it to another problem that I have, but I'm getting errors in the formula.
Table =
UNION (
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS (
Table1[Manufacturer],
"Variation", SUM ( Table1[2016 Sales] ) - SUM ( Table1[2015 Sales] )
),
ROW ( "Manufacturer,; "2015 Sales", "Variation", SUM ( Table1[2015 Sales] ) )
)