March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
I have a table of projects, expenses and budgets. I wanted to calculated variance from budget then do some filtering on those that are say 10,000 under budget. I have run into a few problems
I used a new column of Variance = table1[actuals ytd] - table1[budget ytd]
However if there are multiple lines for a project I get the variance per line when I need it aggregated at the project level.
I get:
Proj1 Amount1 variance 1
Proj1 Amount2 variance 2
Proj1 Amount3 variance 3
Proj2 Amount4 variance 4
Proj2 Amount5 variance 5
Proj2 Amount6 variance 6
Proj2 Amount7 variance 7
I really just need Project 1 and Project 2 the variances aggregated.
Seems like it should be simple, but looks to be hard.
then after i would want to be able to filter on variance totals.
Any thoughts?
Alan
Solved! Go to Solution.
No that should work. If you put a chart/table in your report with Project Number as axis and the measure as the value, it will calculate that measure for each Project Number as if that were a filter applied to the underlying data.
In more complex examples, there may be performance differences between calculated DAX columns and columns created in the query editor. The query editor generally will apply query folding and push the processing workload to the data source (where applicable), whereas the calculated DAX column happens within Power BI. DAX is way more flexible than the query editor, however, so my best advice is to do the ETL and mashing phase as much as possible in the query editor, but save the advanced pivoting and calculating for DAX.
If you just want a measure, you could use something like the following:
Proj1Variance = Calculate(Sum(TableName[Variance]),Filter(TableName, [Project] = "Proj1"))
I would create the calculated variance column in the query editor, then use the "Group By" function to group rows by Project and sum the variance column.
thanks for the fast reply....
I also just changed the calculated column to a measure and it seemed to work.
YTD Variance = sum(CurYear[Actuals YTD]) - sum( CurYear[Budget YTD])
am i missing something as to why this might be bad?
thanks again
Alan
Hi @asjones,
The formula of Calculated Column and Calculated Measure in your scenario are same.
Did you select "Don't summarize" for actual & budget? it could be the reason to force data in table showing row by row
No that should work. If you put a chart/table in your report with Project Number as axis and the measure as the value, it will calculate that measure for each Project Number as if that were a filter applied to the underlying data.
In more complex examples, there may be performance differences between calculated DAX columns and columns created in the query editor. The query editor generally will apply query folding and push the processing workload to the data source (where applicable), whereas the calculated DAX column happens within Power BI. DAX is way more flexible than the query editor, however, so my best advice is to do the ETL and mashing phase as much as possible in the query editor, but save the advanced pivoting and calculating for DAX.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
124 | |
87 | |
85 | |
70 | |
51 |
User | Count |
---|---|
205 | |
153 | |
97 | |
79 | |
69 |